NYboro
Well-known member
I'm sure no-one's going to argue with you.If my stats are correct, Paddy successful penalty was our 265th home penalty & 397 in total since 1899
I'm sure no-one's going to argue with you.If my stats are correct, Paddy successful penalty was our 265th home penalty & 397 in total since 1899
We didnt score a penalty, or it wasn't recorded in our football league debut season, I have checked & re-checked from John Brown to PaddyI'm sure no-one's going to argue with you.
Jones got all that and then didn't come on, then got it all again a few minutes laterSiliki coming on after receiving instructions from 4 different coaches all at the same time
Got on as Warnock had no choice - will be dropped when others are fitNow THAT is a genuine ray of sunshine. A proper goal, from open play, by a young Boro lad given a rare chance.
Did we miss any?We didnt score a penalty, or it wasn't recorded in our football league debut season, I have checked & re-checked from John Brown to Paddy
Loads mate, thats for another statto, a mate of mine is compliling missed Boro penaltiesDid we miss any?
Think we have an ok record at home to Barnsley from memory of tooWish we could play Peterborough every week, we would most likely be promoted, unbeaten at home v Posh
Won 7
Drew 2
Lost zero
Goals for 17
Goals against 2
Can’t argue with what you’ve said TBH. I just think it was two poor teams. I sort of enjoyed it because I love watching football but the Boro’s quality until the subs were made was mental. We were absolutely appalling. That’s the reason I struggle to give lads 7s or more.So a CB who wins a penalty, should have won another penalty, scored a penalty, had 46 passes at 85%, had a goal saving recovary and didn't put a foot wrong defensively should get a 6??
As a team, I absolutely agree, as a team performance it was disjointed, not surprising when we look at having a CM at CB, a left CM at RWB, a winger at LWB and a LW at CM. All the units other than up top were scratch units. But despite that I don't think anyone let themselves down as an individual, and some players really put miles in today. As a team performance I'd give it a 5/10Can’t argue with what you’ve said TBH. I just think it was two poor teams. I sort of enjoyed it because I love watching football but the Boro’s quality until the subs were made was mental. We were absolutely appalling. That’s the reason I struggle to give lads 7s or more.
Viv a fair post on the surface however it is overly simplistic to just write about 4 at the back especially when the opposition played 5 in midfield and had we done as you suggest we’d have 2 of the back four being midfielders and not natural defendersI think an issue today was the manager could've played with one player out of position but chose to play with four out of position instead. Howson at right back, Bamba and McNair in the middle and Kokolo at left back. The team was all over the shop for 70-75mins. It was a disjointed team and a very disjointed game as a result.
The main thing was the win and we can hopefully kick on now. Peltier will be back on Wednesday night so I'll brace myself for another reshuffle.
A good result.
It was a different line up.
Its good to see us short of the usual players.
It gave those who are "not ready" the chance to show that they are "ready".
One gave the assist to the other, who scored his second goal in the senior team career.
A little lop - sided.
Coburn needs to start against Barnsley.
You cant have a lad on a high, then demote him to the bench next match.
The usual bag of liquorice allsorts cant wint two games on the trot - so use the subs and
start with Issiah Jones [a - ha] to run the balls off the opposition.
Can't argue with much of what you've said really, but I'm not sure Warnock deserves credit for playing Tav and Hernandez at wing-back as he's played wingers there before and it hasn't worked. I think he put them there because he felt had no other option. Peterborough should've had a penalty at 0-0 as well; if the referee had given them that then would you be saying Warnock deserved credit? I'm not so sure anyone would.Viv a fair post on the surface however it is overly simplistic to just write about 4 at the back especially when the opposition played 5 in midfield and had we done as you suggest we’d have 2 of the back four being midfielders and not natural defenders
The main reason Neil Warnock got it right yesterday was based principally for 2 reasons ;
- he played the same formation as posh and so with better players and at home I’d expect us to come out on top
- playing with two midfielders as RWB and LWB allowed those players to show more of their natural game of attacking and creating so a cute move by Neil Warnock rather than have midfielders trying to be defenders against inferior opponents.
You give the lad the start, then see how it goes.Coburn needs to start against Barnsley.
You cant have a lad on a high, then demote him to the bench next match.
No, disagree, what should happen is coburn gets 30 mins on Wednesday therefore a bit longer to build his confidence
Unless he is tearing it up in training which I expect isn’t the case
Why do you say that?There’s no way coburn will start on wed