Well what a crock of @#$% they are ...
Where my partner lives theres a grey area between where the local council resident permit/disc zone ends and a plot of private land. There are 4 spaces that have never had privacy notices put on vehicles and then another space where my partner parked her car (on 1 occasion) and received one of these followed by a parking notice in the post
Ive been dealing with this for her and weve had the appeal dismissed and been advised to contact the operator within 14 days to make payment of 'the charge'.
Ive since discovered via googling The IAS are independent of the parking company, but are run in-house by the IPC, raising a potential conflict of interest.
Evidence shows that the success rate for appeals to the IAS is very low (surprise surprise)
The Appellant was parked adjacent to a sign which states 'No Parking', it could not be clearer. This is nonsense as the vehicle was parked to the right of the sign in the grey area between where the end of permit zone is and start of the 'private land' (see silver car in image)
Do i just ignore future correspondence ie debt collection from the parking company unless they issue a CCJ?
I feel like theyre proper trying to have my eyes out and if i see any vehicles parked in this space in future i will put my own 'privacy notices' on windscreens to warn other drivers they risk a £100 charge by leaving their vehicle there to pi$$ on this company's income stream
Where my partner lives theres a grey area between where the local council resident permit/disc zone ends and a plot of private land. There are 4 spaces that have never had privacy notices put on vehicles and then another space where my partner parked her car (on 1 occasion) and received one of these followed by a parking notice in the post
Ive been dealing with this for her and weve had the appeal dismissed and been advised to contact the operator within 14 days to make payment of 'the charge'.
Ive since discovered via googling The IAS are independent of the parking company, but are run in-house by the IPC, raising a potential conflict of interest.
Evidence shows that the success rate for appeals to the IAS is very low (surprise surprise)
The Appellant was parked adjacent to a sign which states 'No Parking', it could not be clearer. This is nonsense as the vehicle was parked to the right of the sign in the grey area between where the end of permit zone is and start of the 'private land' (see silver car in image)
Do i just ignore future correspondence ie debt collection from the parking company unless they issue a CCJ?
I feel like theyre proper trying to have my eyes out and if i see any vehicles parked in this space in future i will put my own 'privacy notices' on windscreens to warn other drivers they risk a £100 charge by leaving their vehicle there to pi$$ on this company's income stream