The Budget 2025

Bought by people who already own one so then renting them out to the homeless tenants you have evicted. Makes no sense at all. The rental market is necessary for those who can’t afford to buy.
 
Bought by people who already own one so then renting them out to the homeless tenants you have evicted. Makes no sense at all. The rental market is necessary for those who can’t afford to buy.
I agree, but I was responding to the "get rid of landlords" and theprisoners comment about how that would make millions of people homeless. Answer: the landlords would evict them and sell the houses.

I think we're on the same page.......... perhaps not the same paragraph though :cool:
 
I agree, but I was responding to the "get rid of landlords" and theprisoners comment about how that would make millions of people homeless. Answer: the landlords would evict them and sell the houses.

I think we're on the same page.......... perhaps not the same paragraph though :cool:
Ha I did wonder.
 
Evict the tenants and sell the houses perhaps
Yeah once you go beyond a stupid statement like make landlords illegal and delve into even 1% of the implications around something like that, you soon realise how much of a stupid statement it actually is, but even more concerning is how many are calling for it and actually think it’s a realistic proposition


Although this government quite clearly do despise anyone who works hard and has a bit of success, so I wouldn’t be shocked to see this at some stage
 
Make landlords illegal.

Why people go on about landlords is beyond me.

Ban air BnB. Encourage people to become landlords.
Build shitloads of social housing.
Double counsel tax for empty housing.
Shoot nimbys.

And if no one is prepared to do that then stop immigration and ban people from having kids.

It isn't landlords that are the problem. It's homeowners and it's inequality.

Nothing will happen as homeowners won't want the value of their property to crash. So we will see feeble bills dribbling through parliament while everyone's rent skyrockets, as more and more landlords selling up.

The only vague hope is that Raynor seems to understand that before doing anything, the stock of counsel housing needs to massively increase.
 
What is needed is to restore some of the direct government funding for local authorities which has been slashed by 50% plus in the last 14 years.
True, but where does the government funding come from. Everyone wants the government to fund more - NHS, education, local government, min wage etc. But no-one wants to pay for it.
 
Obviously the current £90.50 per week Jobseekers Allowance is so high its stopping 1m adults working @ £11.44 per hour, so JSA needs to be frozen, according to some past Chancellors like rich man Osbourne.
 
Obviously the current £90.50 per week Jobseekers Allowance is so high its stopping 1m adults working @ £11.44 per hour, so JSA needs to be frozen, according to some past Chancellors like rich man Osbourne.
It’s a tough one that because there are many genuine cases. I’ve tried to survive off it in the past and it’s really really hard as it’s nothing. Could force people on it into community projects after say 6 months to help them get into work again. It’s pointless the long term unemployed getting a minimum wage job as they’re worse off. All unemployed immigrants should be put into community projects to help integration and their ability to get jobs as they only end up doing gig economy jobs. Indigenous ling term unemployed should also be forced into community projects.
 
They are doing this in Social Work already, fast track qualification + bursary for those with an existing degree
That’s good to know. There’s so much work that the unemployed can do which would help communities and help them get back into employment
 
BBC News - Budget 2024: Minimum wage to rise to £12.21 an hour next year - BBC News

This paragraph struck a positive chord with me from that article. Credit where it’s due. Rome wasn’t built in a day!

“It comes after the government instructed the Low Pay Commission, which recommends minimum wage rates, to include the cost of living in its calculations.”
 
That’s good to know. There’s so much work that the unemployed can do which would help communities and help them get back into employment
Which essentially means they would be working for less than minimum wage, which would be illegal
 
Which essentially means they would be working for less than minimum wage, which would be illegal
They’re not being paid as employees. Lots of ppl take internships to help get work. I signed on for a decent period when I was young and it’s hard to get out of it as the job centre are useless and don’t really help you so you get stuck in a rut. It’s hard to then get back into employment. Getting ppl in the routine again and boosting their confidence will help to find them work whilst providing beneficial community work.
 
Like tuition fees the cap is where every company will set its price.


It has to be cheaper and permanent. If I go to the town now it will cost me £5-£8 to park (worst case scenario, I can park further out and walk in for free) so if I am alone getting the bus is about break-even. Taking the family is £24 return at £3 each. Even in the best case scenario where kids are free it is more expensive and it is far less convenient. To get people using public transport you need to create the tipping point so every journey is cheaper and it has to be convenient. If the bus is only once an hour then it's another reason to take the car instead of drive. We need to get to a point where the routes are regular enough that whenever you turn up there is one in the next few minutes. We know the system works because it does in places that do it properly like London but the rest of the country has high prices, no routes and hourly service at best and they say they are cutting them because nobody is using them but nobody is using them because they are crap. A massive increase in quality of service will see a massive uptake in use and it is far easier to get a lot of people to pay a little than not a lot of people to pay a lot.

The cap is also really annoying because it's per journey leg so if you have a journey where you need to change, like a lot of people do because bus routes are typically hub and spoke, then the cost is really high again.
Agree with all that.

Perhaps re-regulating all public bus services: bringing them back into public ownership and operated by local authorities - [like they are in Nottingham and Greater Manchester] gives local accountability and operating services according to need, not profit. If public transport is to be a positive benefit to the traveller / commuter / shopper, it has to be cheap, reliable, regular and with modern vehicles of the highest standards, using biofuel, not diesel.

National Express has to be renationalised, as services between major cities and urban areas have been cherry-picked because they make profits. Many areas, particularly rural counties like Norfolk, Suffolk, Devon, Cornwall, Northumberland, Lincolnshire, North and East Yorkshire and Cumbria are poorly served, apart from main arterial routes. The days when National Express had an extensive National network, directly serving towns such as Wells, Keswick, Coalville and Swaffham are no longer, without long waits and inconvenient connections.

You can't control what you don't own.

The same goes for the railways. If 10% of the subsidies spent on maintaining and building major road networks were spent on the railways, it would make a huge difference to service levels, reliability and quality of travel. Then again, that would only be possible, by renationalising the railways and running them for the public, not for profits and private shareholders.
 
They’re not being paid as employees. Lots of ppl take internships to help get work. I signed on for a decent period when I was young and it’s hard to get out of it as the job centre are useless and don’t really help you so you get stuck in a rut. It’s hard to then get back into employment. Getting ppl in the routine again and boosting their confidence will help to find them work whilst providing beneficial community work.
If you’re forced to partake in tasks in return for being paid JSA then yous are effectively an employee so should be paid fairly for this.

But I don’t doubt for a second it’s beneficial to anyone long term employed. It just can’t be forced on people.

Community work is great for everyone, but those participating have to do it because they want to and have a passion for whatever it is. Making people do it who don’t want to will never work
 
Back
Top