So Compulsory Vaccinations are Happening Then…..

Do you proof read your posts? Some despicable comments there
Just reflecting on his behaviour against me. It honestly got to a flat bizarre situation where he was changing what he thought just to disagree with me, and following me around only to complain about me replying.

It genuinely didn't seem to be stable behaviour. Luckily he stopped it but it was freaky for a few months
 
Sherlock had the whiff of a Trolltown alter ego about him, I now believe they are probably the same person after TT turns up on this thread days later to further hurl the insults.

He only swears on his Sherlock account though. Good cover.
 
Sherlock had the whiff of a Trolltown alter ego about him, I now believe they are probably the same person after TT turns up on this thread days later to further hurl the insults.

He only swears on his Sherlock account though. Good cover.
I know you'll get this a lot: But you're wrong
 
Sherlock had the whiff of a Trolltown alter ego about him, I now believe they are probably the same person after TT turns up on this thread days later to further hurl the insults.

He only swears on his Sherlock account though. Good cover.
C-658VsXoAo3ovC.jpg
 
Just reflecting on his behaviour against me. It honestly got to a flat bizarre situation where he was changing what he thought just to disagree with me, and following me around only to complain about me replying.

It genuinely didn't seem to be stable behaviour. Luckily he stopped it but it was freaky for a few months
Your comments towards him were well below the belt.
 
Did you not read what he is often replying to? They were was just as bad imo, they both give as good as they get anyway.
Having had a look I don't think so, he went to far when he started bringing people's 'conditions' into it. Its indefensible.
 
Having had a look I don't think so, he went to far when he started bringing people's 'conditions' into it. Its indefensible.
Maybe so, on one or two specific posts, but overall on the thread and historically, I wouldn't say so. I thought "I don't like you, and no one else does really either." was way over the line, and not true, never mind the "horrible man", "idiot" and "coward" abuse. But like I said, they both give as good as they get.

I like ST, he stands up for what he believes in (which often founded on evidence) and isn't afraid to admit he's wrong or switch sides if it's right to do that.

I wish they both wouldn't advise who everyone should listen too mind, that's petty to say the least.
 
Maybe so, on one or two specific posts, but overall on the thread and historically, I wouldn't say so. I thought "I don't like you, and no one else does really either." was way over the line, and not true, never mind the "horrible man", "idiot" and "coward" abuse. But like I said, they both give as good as they get.

I like ST, he stands up for what he believes in (which often founded on evidence) and isn't afraid to admit he's wrong or switch sides if it's right to do that.

I wish they both wouldn't advise who everyone should listen too mind, that's petty to say the least.
Are you smalltown by any chance Andy?
 
I don’t bother with him now but we got into a crazy loop where he’d follow my posts to start arguments with me, even on subjects we agreed upon, and then complain that an argument had been started.
A psychologist would have a field day with that!
To which the reply was
You really are a horrible man, aren't you.

You seem to think mental health issues are fun to throw around. That tells me everything I need to know about you. You are worthless, have dubious morals and are a coward.
ST referred to a particular action that Lg had taken he did not call him a name. It is hardly a reference to his mental health more a reference to a rather obtuse and confused argument. Lg has a habit of picking arguments where none exist. On the COVID thread today he started referencing Malaria for no obvious reason? Lg does get very personal and is far from being the innocent party he is trying to pretend to be. Indeed the initial post by ST that he responded to on this thread was a reply to another poster. Why respond at all? He does like to take offence when someone bites back at him and claim some sort of moral ascendency.
 
To which the reply was

ST referred to a particular action that Lg had taken he did not call him a name. It is hardly a reference to his mental health more a reference to a rather obtuse and confused argument. Lg has a habit of picking arguments where none exist. On the COVID thread today he started referencing Malaria for no obvious reason? Lg does get very personal and is far from being the innocent party he is trying to pretend to be. Indeed the initial post by ST that he responded to on this thread was a reply to another poster. Why respond at all? He does like to take offence when someone bites back at him and claim some sort of moral ascendency.

Oh do be quiet, he has made mental health comments to me on numerous occassions. A subject that is awful for many people, some of them on this board.
 
To which the reply was

ST referred to a particular action that Lg had taken he did not call him a name. It is hardly a reference to his mental health more a reference to a rather obtuse and confused argument. Lg has a habit of picking arguments where none exist. On the COVID thread today he started referencing Malaria for no obvious reason? Lg does get very personal and is far from being the innocent party he is trying to pretend to be. Indeed the initial post by ST that he responded to on this thread was a reply to another poster. Why respond at all? He does like to take offence when someone bites back at him and claim some sort of moral ascendency.
Laughing is entitled to an opinion on whatever and if he brings up malaria so what, whether he's right or wrong it doesn't matter. To bring up mental health or someone's condition is absolutely indefensible and shouldn't be tolerated on a public forum.
 
Laughing is entitled to an opinion on whatever and if he brings up malaria so what
Oh indeed so and threads drift (as this one demonstrates admirably) but his point was that those discussing COVID did not care about Malaria! No one had mentioned Malaria at all to that juncture. A demonstration of a "straw man argument" I suppose?
 
So is compulsory vaccination happening in this part of the world or not?
Depends what you mean by "this part of the world"?

In the low vax countries in the EU, yes, it will save them loads of deaths.

In the high uptake vax countries, probably not (which includes all the UK of course), other than for those working with the most at risk, so a larger risk reduction measure.
 
Oh indeed so and threads drift (as this one demonstrates admirably) but his point was that those discussing COVID did not care about Malaria! No one had mentioned Malaria at all to that juncture. A demonstration of a "straw man argument" I suppose?
It was no such thing. It was, and was described as, comparing a deadly disease that just doesn't happen to effect europe and is ignored, perhaps it shouldn't be. Folks were jumping on others for being selfish, we all are to one extent or another.

ST dug this thread, that had no responses for a few days to have a go at me. Then talks about me stalking him. I haven't responded to him for weeks!

He was making light of mental health issues and not for the first time. It's deplorable behaviour and diminishes those who do suffer. Some play in to his hands.
 
Back
Top