Gets better the less he plays does McGree.
Poor Azaz plays every week, scores and assists but gets pelters.
Funny how some players get an easier ride.
We had this discussion same time last year. It's a shame, because he's a good footballer, but I just don't trust him to stay fit over the course of the season.
I'd be happy for us to take £1m for him to be honest, just to get him off the wage bill. I'd imagine he'll be one of our highest earners.
Hackney, McGree, Rav, Lenihan, Morris, Conway all good footballers. We need to keep them fit and replace if they leave. We’re still a 4-12th place side really with current squad. It won’t take massive amounts of quality to bump us into play off favourites
Its funny how we had very few injuries under Wilder, then very few for most of Carrick's first season, but been riddled with them ever since.Along with Hackney, when fit he’s the first name on the team sheet for me. I really hope he can put his injury troubles behind him and thrive under new coaching. I’m hoping that our appalling injury record was in part down to something we were doing in training, intensity or whatever, and things settle down now. We are due some luck on the injury front!
We changed the training pitches post Warnock didn't we to reduce injuries?Its funny how we had very few injuries under Wilder, then very few for most of Carrick's first season, but been riddled with them ever since.
Could just be a coincidence of course. But it could also suggest Wilder (or his team) were doing something that was helping reduce the number of injuries either in pre-season, during the season or both and that Carrick benefitted from that the first 6 months.
I think Wilder commented on sorting out the fitness or number of injuries when he joined didn't he? Or am I making that up?
Small thing maybe, but although he expected his strikers to run themselves into the ground, he also nearly always changed them after about 70 mins. Of course sometimes its an accumulation of little things like that can make a big difference.
Don't know what his record with injuries has been like elsewhere mind.
I thought the training pitches were changed last summer? Could be both I suppose!We changed the training pitches post Warnock didn't we to reduce injuries?
The there was a root & branch investigation about the injuries in Carricks first closed season and the head physio left shortly afterwards?
I'm no expert, but I'd have thought prevention would be more to do with the sports scientists and maybe the conditioning guys than the physios. Although maybe the club were also unhappy with how long players were out for, diagnosis etc.
Don’t disagree, but 4 consecutive starts might be a stretch. Maybe starting alternating games for the first few months, give him recovery time?He needs this first half season properly managed , like no more than 4 consecutive starts, then actually rest him for 4 games with only light training.
All Boro fans would 100% agree with this, but sadly the club has absolutely no control over this.Don't let him go to intl games, period, let him really rest those fortnights ( 3 of them )
That might make sense pre season, when there's little on the line (i.e no matches which = points), but for during the season it kind of goes against modern sports science, from what I understand.Edwards was talking about training and injuries. He said that you want to train harder than you play so that you can cope with a match. I found that surprising and I do remember when he got sacked from Watford fans were talking about him over-working players. He also talks about neither under- nor over-cooking players.
I suppose we'll see if after 12 games our injury numbers remain the same.
I had a check to see what the actual quote was. https://www.gazettelive.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/how-rob-edwards-hoping-solve-31953927That might make sense pre season, when there's little on the line (i.e no matches which = points), but for during the season it kind of goes against modern sports science, from what I understand.
They should probably be doing a load of longer duration zone 2 during the week (low intensity), with the odd bit of very high intensity (zone 4-5), otherwise fatigue/ injury will destroy them.
You're never going to get players training harder than they play either (if they are playing/ on the team sheet), assuming they actually want to do well in their career.
He might have been a bit misunderstood, as this is all pretty well known now and they will be measuring the players work load/ fatigue/ recovery etc.
Maybe he's more on about building up the mental strength?
We have to be able to train the way we play. The players have to be able to experience that and feel that during the week. We have to do that without breaking people. One or two might break a bit early on, we’ll have to see, but we have to get to a point where the training is more difficult than the game is, and we want the game to be intense.
Not to the point where we’re breaking them, but not under-cooking them either. We’ve got to get people into that sweet spot, and there’s so much to that now as well – your diet, your sleep, your recovery. All of that comes into it.
It just all sounds like a bit of nothing to be honest, no different to how any other club would train, but if he's wanting to recreate matches they would train 11 v 11, and no club really does that do they? 11 a side is obviously, more jogging and long sprints, where as half pitch more running and shorter sprints.I had a check to see what the actual quote was. https://www.gazettelive.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/how-rob-edwards-hoping-solve-31953927
What he is quoted as saying is.
He also says
They certainly look to be pushing them hard in Portugal. I suppose there is a difference between risk of impact injuries versus strains from over-exertion so maybe that's what the issue is.