They also had fascism until the late 70s so I don't think copying that bunch of crackpots is a good idea.Interesting. VAR has been in regular use in the Spanish equivalent of the championship (La Liga 2). For some time now.
By now it has just been accepted by the players, clubs and supporters. For the top 2 leagues in the country.
I know it is not perfect. However, in Spain, it has been shown to reduce the number of clearly wrong decisions. Like the Boro one.
Also like the possible sending off. If that should have been the right decision. (I have not seen it).
Er hang on what about Latte getting punched in the head after 1 minute, red card?If there was we would have been down to ten men in the 20th minute.
I seen it back this morning. Was not much in it . Not a red card that one.Er hang on what about Latte getting punched in the head after 1 minute, red card?
When I say passion I mean when a goal is scored and you cheer you know instantly if the goal is going to stand and can put all your emotion and passion into cheering the goal when VAR is not used. When VAR is used yes you cheer when the ball goes into the net but you have to wait minutes before you can really celebrate the goal, by then the passion/emotion has been killed and it’s not the same feeling.I’m a big fan of VAR.
The comment above about passion killer…
What passion last night? nothing to kill.
Yes I do know what you are saying and I think you are right, a delayed goal celebration is not the same.When I say passion I mean when a goal is scored and you cheer you know instantly if the goal is going to stand and can put all your emotion and passion into cheering the goal when VAR is not used. When VAR is used yes you cheer when the ball goes into the net but you have to wait minutes before you can really celebrate the goal, by then the passion/emotion has been killed and it’s not the same feeling.
Funny.They also had fascism until the late 70s so I don't think copying that bunch of crackpots is a good idea.
Very few decisions are just issues of fact.As someone very correctly put it on another thread “VAR should interfere on matters of fact, not judgement”. This would cover offside when a “goal” is scored, whether a foul was committed in the area or outside, whether a ball was out of play before a “goal” was scored or a blatant handball in the penalty area that the ref didn’t see. If VAR isn’t sure after 30 seconds, then go with the on field decision.
It worked well in the Euros. It could work well in Championship.
It doesn’t work well in Premier League because they analyse things to the nth degree and often take 5 minutes to decide someone is offside by 1mm.
Isn’t the Championship the 5th biggest league in Europe?
If the ball touches the hand, it may or may not be a handball offence, but it's definitely not a foul.One of the things you mentioned is “blatant” handballs. But blatant is a subjective judgment. As is whether something is handball at all for so long as the law has elements of degree in it and doesn’t say that any time the ball touches the hand, it’s a foul.
A foul is an unfair physical offence committed against an opponent, usually with the foot, leg, hand or arm but sometimes with another part of the body such as the hip or shoulder.
Offences that are not committed against an opponent are not fouls, e.g. handball, offside.
I’m not having all this sheet about Hammo leave the lad alone he’s a joy to watch and you knockers will bow down in timeHad McGree been sent off, we would've played 70 mins of the game with 10 men. But instead Hamilton came on to replace him, which was largely the same thing.
IdiotThey also had fascism until the late 70s so I don't think copying that bunch of crackpots is a good idea.
They also had fascism until the late 70s so I don't think copying that bunch of crackpots is a good idea.
Interesting what would have happened if we had had to play for 70 minutes with 10 men - wonder if Blackburn would have been a bit more ambitious, and therefore more open for us