the_holgate_roof
Well-known member
Thursday at 00:01
Can guarantee it was moved from 4 till 5 because they forgot people would be watching football.
They've now moved it to half 6 because they forgot people would be watching the rugby.
Rather watch Boris all day than Rugby. FFS I think I would rather watch Gove and Rees-Mogg doing the Charleston than watch Rugby
Looks like Boris has been keeping his fingers crossed for some time, hoping things may happen for the better, even the scientists have been screaming at him to lock down for a month now, too little too late again....
Kids education is important, of course it is, but I've not seen many reasons why we can't put things on hold, to get the R down faster?
Do they actually want the R down in schools and uni, or is it some secret herd immunity ploy for those groups?
Agree, the schools thing is odd, kids are super spreaders and guess what kids live in communities and families, it also puts teachers on the frontline, why is this risk being taken??Can someone explain why schools and universities are being left open? I'm not sure whether I'm for or against it, but can't really see many reasons for keeping them open.
Just looking for the pro's and negatives from each side, and what information there is to back up each side?
Kids education is important, of course it is, but I've not seen many reasons why we can't put things on hold, to get the R down faster?
Do they actually want the R down in schools and uni, or is it some secret herd immunity ploy for those groups?
What is the actual problem if we put the school year on hold and then just caught that back up 1 month per year, for the next few years (for those that have that many years left) or just effectively sacked this year off and then started again next September? Does the school year have to finish in July and start in September? If so, why?
This is all assuming we either come up with a working vaccine before the next school year or method of protecting the vulnerable, but the latter seems harder to achieve and more unrealistic than the vaccine.
Agree, the schools thing is odd, kids are super spreaders and guess what kids live in communities and families, it also puts teachers on the frontline, why is this risk being taken??
Agree, the schools thing is odd, kids are super spreaders and guess what kids live in communities and families, it also puts teachers on the frontline, why is this risk being taken??
No people have to eat to live.Those who work in supermarkets are also on the frontline. Do we shut them too?
People who work in supermarkets can wear PPE, our great govt has said teachers only need it in corridors? Originally they said masks weren't needed at all in schools. Won't be long before they'll catch up to other countries and say masks should be worn at all times.Those who work in supermarkets are also on the frontline. Do we shut them too?
No people have to eat to live.
And kids need to learn to become upstanding citizens of this country.No people have to eat to live.
This is ok mate. They confirmed that this still going ahead but behind closed doors.Hope they keep live sport going. Gutted if the footy stops
Dehvi Shridar on the BBC just pointed out thar the £12B spent on Test & Trace might have been better spent paying people to stay home.
Pretty fair comment I'd say.
It will be announced as not a lockdown lockdown, but closing of places and a restriction to leaving the house similar to March but not the same.
Definitely NOT what SAGE and Keir Starmer said we should do a month ago, with it being another example of the government doing whatever it takes, acting decisively to whack those pesky moles!
Or something...paff, whiff...