Muniz & Hoppe

Muniz been treated badly in my opinion. Hopefully will go on to be a success elsewhere. Not had enough game time under Carrick for whatever reason.
 
Like Michael Carrick said today: there are players he would like to give more minutes.
But, looking at Carricks results - have we the need to play Muniz for the sake of playing him?
I suggest not.
Thats football.
 
I don’t think anyone is surprised by the news that we’re offloading (or trying to) these two. MC has done the right thing in supporting them in their training, attitude but the bottom line is that they’ve been busts. That’s how it goes.
 
Expat Smoggie said:
I don’t think anyone is surprised by the news that we’re offloading (or trying to) these two. MC has done the right thing in supporting them in their training, attitude but the bottom line is that they’ve been busts. That’s how it goes.
Click to expand...
Archer looks to be more technical than Muniz, Crooks has stepped up as a striker further restricting Hoppe’s game time.
 
Tbf Muniz haven't been given a run. Hoppe looks average at best, investment maybe? But let's offload the wages and look for improvements
 
asredastheycome said:
Muniz been treated badly in my opinion. Hopefully will go on to be a success elsewhere. Not had enough game time under Carrick for whatever reason.
Click to expand...
Probably because the strikers that have played have smashed it, if they weren't scoring and he wasn't getting game time, then you might have a point.

I like his enthusiasm, but he hasn't showing his game to be mature enough yet for regular championship football
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top