MFC's SC's are very good value.

indeedido

Well-known member
Most people were initially shocked at MFC increasing the price of SC's by what appears so much for season 2023-24.
The truth is that the additional revenue the price increase will raise will not nearly cover the inflation impact on the running costs of the current operation. Nowhere near, as I posted shortly after the initial announcement.
That is before even considering any additional player related costs, team strengthening, stadium investment or other additional infrastructure.

Personally I really applaud the club being more open and communicating so much more info on revenue streams - in particular SC breakdowns by stand and age group.

So on analysing the data they released via the Forum (and posted by Rob) I would suggest the following observations based on that 2022-23 data:
(Obviously excluding Hospitality SC's, matchday tickets and away fans)
I think some slight variances may be explained by the Half Season Card inclusions by MFC in the figures.

1. Every SC offers very good value for money, at the very least.
I sit in West Upper, where on average adults paid £27.05 per match on a SC. I am a GC holder, so got the Free Drink too.
The cheapest adult average paid was in NW corner where £19.78 was the average price per match.
The average adult SC was £21.35 per match. (The Club obviously only receive £17.79 of this ex VAT)

2. Every Over 65 gets an excellent deal on a SC.
The Average Pensioner paid £15.00 per match on a SC.
In the West Upper (highest) they paid £19.40 per match mostly I'd guess with a free drink. The lowest paid was £13.52 per match in SW. In the GRFZ the pensioners paid £13.74 each. I don't think anybody could seriously criticise the pricing for supporters who almost by definition have been following Boro all their lives and paid in a lot of money over the years.

3. Under 18's SC prices are extremely good value everywhere.


Outside the GRFZ U18 SC's paid £7.52 per match on average.
The highest paid was £7.75 in South, the lowest outside GRFZ was £7.12 in NW.
Inside the GRFZ on average the 1,207 U18's paid £2.68 per match, with 791 of them paying just £1.88 per match.
All of those prices are extremely low, but the GRFZ ones are unrealistically and constrainingly low.

4. 18-21 SC prices are good value everywhere.

On average 18-21's paid £11.91 per match.
Highest paid was £14.19 in West Upper, where there are only 86.
Lowest paid outside GRFZ was in North £11.50 per match. GRFZ £11.13.
Only 1016 or 5.3% of our SC holders are 18-21.

5. The GRFZ is incredibly cheap, is predictably full, a closed shop.

The GRFZ is the only part of the stadium where younger kids get even cheaper access.
725 U11 kids paid absolutely nothing, while in total 894 U11's paid a total of £9,475 or £0.46 per match.
The gap to the average U18 at £7.52 per match everywhere else or £172.85 per season is very big.
2101 of the total 5131 Kids SC's in the whole stadium are in the GRFZ.
41% of the total kids paid £83,737 or 14% of the £607,462 total kids revenue.
That is a strange model to expand.

6. 618 Personal Assistants pay absolutely nothing.

This is appropriate, but extremely generous too by the Club.
Over 3% of the SC base.


7. There are still thousands of empty seats on average at every match and will be outside the PL.

We are currently averaging over 25,000 (inc Away fans and est £1k Hospitality), have 19,061 standard SC's, estimate 2,000 lost to segregation.
That leaves on average c5k empty seats at least.
Whilst the best way to fill them is PL football and or success on the pitch, it does appear that the club could be more creative to fill more of those seats more often.

Given the GRFZ FULL signs, I understand some leaping to the conclusion to simply expand the GRFZ and tie in those fans, especially the young ones. Just get some/any revenue for those empty seats.
I think this would be wrong for the following reasons:

a) The revenue concept is bizarre. There is no need to give lots more seats away at such incredibly low revenue, that then leave the club trapped as they currently are with GRFZ.

b) Existing families would try and switch in for the lower prices, reducing revenue immediately and leaving empty more seats in other areas.

c) Family groups also want to sit in other parts of the stadium.

d) It is the matchday pricing that prevents more of those empty seats being sold around the stadium. Simply, the premium is far too big and the matchday kids prices are simply way too high.
A saturday Adult ticket in West Upper costs £36 to watch Preston and £21 for an U18. £57 for a parent to take just 1 kid. (North is £49) It is not surprising there are loads of empty seats except on Boxing Day in these areas.

The gap between SC price per match and Match day is too big.
The gap between GRFZ kids SC and other kids SC is too big.
The gap between GRFZ kids SC per match and Matchday kids is obscene.

I fully understand that Gibson is effectively subsidising all SC's through his Group loans to cover annual losses and it is his call to make, but it is still true that the rest of the SC's do subsidise the GRFZ.

The last thing I am advocating is reducing SC prices or not applying an increase for the new season as covered above.
I am simply suggesting that Matchday prices should not be increased further (SC discounts are already massive) and perhaps a Free U18 ticket should be available with every Adult Matchday ticket anywhere in the stadium to encourage more fans to attend more often and eventually trade up to a SC if they can.
So an Adult and kid for £36 in West Upper or £31 in North.
An existing Adult & U18 SC combo paid £34.64, so is still a little cheaper than the £36, in the North they paid £27.29.
If they were so "outraged" there are only 281 U18 SC's in the entire West Stand Upper at present and they pay just £7.59 per match.

I think other intelligent packaging of matches at discounted rates with Free Kids included would be worth pursuing. This could provide real value, sell seats, generate more revenue and not be nearly so constraining as an expanded GRFZ.
(I bet the opex in operating and refreshing the GFRZ is higher too).

Newy raises lots of points around Merchandising (Quality, Value, Availability, Revenue generated) and there is also lots that does need to be done to improve the experience and revenue generated by Concourse Operations. These could indeed help offset the need for large SC increases, but my own personal view remains that the SC prices are very reasonable and the increase absolutely justified.
Perhaps the person who should benefit from the extra revenue that is undoubtedly available from Commercial and Merchandise should be Gibson?
Maybe that would provide the money to refresh the stadium.

Before you say it Rob, yes this my opinion, but based on data provided by the club, not back of a fag packet.
I think most fair minded supporters will be grateful that MFC have opened up and appreciate the financial position and stark realities.
 
Most people were initially shocked at MFC increasing the price of SC's by what appears so much for season 2023-24.
The truth is that the additional revenue the price increase will raise will not nearly cover the inflation impact on the running costs of the current operation. Nowhere near, as I posted shortly after the initial announcement.
That is before even considering any additional player related costs, team strengthening, stadium investment or other additional infrastructure.

Personally I really applaud the club being more open and communicating so much more info on revenue streams - in particular SC breakdowns by stand and age group.

So on analysing the data they released via the Forum (and posted by Rob) I would suggest the following observations based on that 2022-23 data:
(Obviously excluding Hospitality SC's, matchday tickets and away fans)
I think some slight variances may be explained by the Half Season Card inclusions by MFC in the figures.

1. Every SC offers very good value for money, at the very least.
I sit in West Upper, where on average adults paid £27.05 per match on a SC. I am a GC holder, so got the Free Drink too.
The cheapest adult average paid was in NW corner where £19.78 was the average price per match.
The average adult SC was £21.35 per match. (The Club obviously only receive £17.79 of this ex VAT)

2. Every Over 65 gets an excellent deal on a SC.
The Average Pensioner paid £15.00 per match on a SC.
In the West Upper (highest) they paid £19.40 per match mostly I'd guess with a free drink. The lowest paid was £13.52 per match in SW. In the GRFZ the pensioners paid £13.74 each. I don't think anybody could seriously criticise the pricing for supporters who almost by definition have been following Boro all their lives and paid in a lot of money over the years.

3. Under 18's SC prices are extremely good value everywhere.

Outside the GRFZ U18 SC's paid £7.52 per match on average.
The highest paid was £7.75 in South, the lowest outside GRFZ was £7.12 in NW.
Inside the GRFZ on average the 1,207 U18's paid £2.68 per match, with 791 of them paying just £1.88 per match.
All of those prices are extremely low, but the GRFZ ones are unrealistically and constrainingly low.

4. 18-21 SC prices are good value everywhere.

On average 18-21's paid £11.91 per match.
Highest paid was £14.19 in West Upper, where there are only 86.
Lowest paid outside GRFZ was in North £11.50 per match. GRFZ £11.13.
Only 1016 or 5.3% of our SC holders are 18-21.

5. The GRFZ is incredibly cheap, is predictably full, a closed shop.

The GRFZ is the only part of the stadium where younger kids get even cheaper access.
725 U11 kids paid absolutely nothing, while in total 894 U11's paid a total of £9,475 or £0.46 per match.
The gap to the average U18 at £7.52 per match everywhere else or £172.85 per season is very big.
2101 of the total 5131 Kids SC's in the whole stadium are in the GRFZ.
41% of the total kids paid £83,737 or 14% of the £607,462 total kids revenue.
That is a strange model to expand.

6. 618 Personal Assistants pay absolutely nothing.

This is appropriate, but extremely generous too by the Club.
Over 3% of the SC base.


7. There are still thousands of empty seats on average at every match and will be outside the PL.

We are currently averaging over 25,000 (inc Away fans and est £1k Hospitality), have 19,061 standard SC's, estimate 2,000 lost to segregation.
That leaves on average c5k empty seats at least.
Whilst the best way to fill them is PL football and or success on the pitch, it does appear that the club could be more creative to fill more of those seats more often.

Given the GRFZ FULL signs, I understand some leaping to the conclusion to simply expand the GRFZ and tie in those fans, especially the young ones. Just get some/any revenue for those empty seats.
I think this would be wrong for the following reasons:

a) The revenue concept is bizarre. There is no need to give lots more seats away at such incredibly low revenue, that then leave the club trapped as they currently are with GRFZ.

b) Existing families would try and switch in for the lower prices, reducing revenue immediately and leaving empty more seats in other areas.

c) Family groups also want to sit in other parts of the stadium.

d) It is the matchday pricing that prevents more of those empty seats being sold around the stadium. Simply, the premium is far too big and the matchday kids prices are simply way too high.
A saturday Adult ticket in West Upper costs £36 to watch Preston and £21 for an U18. £57 for a parent to take just 1 kid. (North is £49) It is not surprising there are loads of empty seats except on Boxing Day in these areas.

The gap between SC price per match and Match day is too big.
The gap between GRFZ kids SC and other kids SC is too big.
The gap between GRFZ kids SC per match and Matchday kids is obscene.

I fully understand that Gibson is effectively subsidising all SC's through his Group loans to cover annual losses and it is his call to make, but it is still true that the rest of the SC's do subsidise the GRFZ.

The last thing I am advocating is reducing SC prices or not applying an increase for the new season as covered above.
I am simply suggesting that Matchday prices should not be increased further (SC discounts are already massive) and perhaps a Free U18 ticket should be available with every Adult Matchday ticket anywhere in the stadium to encourage more fans to attend more often and eventually trade up to a SC if they can.
So an Adult and kid for £36 in West Upper or £31 in North.
An existing Adult & U18 SC combo paid £34.64, so is still a little cheaper than the £36, in the North they paid £27.29.
If they were so "outraged" there are only 281 U18 SC's in the entire West Stand Upper at present and they pay just £7.59 per match.

I think other intelligent packaging of matches at discounted rates with Free Kids included would be worth pursuing. This could provide real value, sell seats, generate more revenue and not be nearly so constraining as an expanded GRFZ.
(I bet the opex in operating and refreshing the GFRZ is higher too).

Newy raises lots of points around Merchandising (Quality, Value, Availability, Revenue generated) and there is also lots that does need to be done to improve the experience and revenue generated by Concourse Operations. These could indeed help offset the need for large SC increases, but my own personal view remains that the SC prices are very reasonable and the increase absolutely justified.
Perhaps the person who should benefit from the extra revenue that is undoubtedly available from Commercial and Merchandise should be Gibson?
Maybe that would provide the money to refresh the stadium.

Before you say it Rob, yes this my opinion, but based on data provided by the club, not back of a fag packet.
I think most fair minded supporters will be grateful that MFC have opened up and appreciate the financial position and stark realities.
Post of the week 👍
 
Agree in part R.E the GRFZ bit. Costs me an extra £330 to take my 9 and 11 (next season 10 and 12) so sit in the north rather than the East (it was my decision as I cannot be sitting with a load of kids doing my head in who aren't interested in the footy) however, that gap is too large, regardless of the rationale.
 
I disagree because of the special nature of the Generation Red Family Zone - all the activities that take place behind the scenes and away from the football action - this really develops a community and a family feel and gradually enrols youngsters into the full Boro experience. It is a very safe zone as well for the kids and families.
But in many ways they get a far more fulfilling experience in a concourse where they have entertainment and education - it is helping shape model Boro citizens and nurturing a generation Boro of the future. Surely part of the mission the club is aspiring to.
 
Season Cards from £390 on Wearside ..

Screenshot_20230309-184039_Chrome.jpg

I also see Sunderland had 2x tickets Adult for £20 for the Stoke game via certain outlets

Old habbits die hard haha

 
Last edited:
I think in many ways the GRFZ was a great initiative, however my issue with it is that it doesn't really benefit those supporters aged 14/15.

Realistically, at that age you're going to want to attend the games with your mates, but it means paying for the price of an U18 ticket, which I feel is too expensive for a schoolchild (unless their parents are willing to help with the cost).

I'd prefer it if the club separated the junior pricing into categories. Keep the U18 price the same as it is now and then make it £60 for U16's. This way, 14/15 year olds can easily afford to attend the games with their mates and buy season cards together, and it would still work out cheap for a parent to buy season cards for themselves and their young child.
 
Second highest prices in the league aren’t they in one of the most deprived areas in the country.

Good value compared to what, certainly not the majority of the league, check the Mackems prices out for a start.
The vast majority of Adult SC holders paid £20 per match, many with a free drink.
No Pensioner paid more than £20 a match, most paid about £13.60 per match, many with a free drink.
1016 18-21's paid about £11 per match.
3030 Kids paid £7.50 per match outside the GRFZ.
1207 12-18 year olds paid £2.68 per match inside GRFZ.
894 U11's paid 46p per match in GRFZ.

They are ALL excellent value, some are too cheap.
If you can't see that, I'm not sure exactly what you are looking for.

The Match day prices are expensive, especially for Families, which I am sure is what stops more going.
The point of my post was to highlight how good value the SC's are, that Match prices are what is far too high, especially for kids, and that empty seats would be better filled by free kids places with adults around the stadium to fill the empty seats, rather than giving them away in an overly subsidised way in an expanded GRFZ.

It's all opinions I suppose.
 
Good detailed post and thank you for analysis. I don’t have much to add other than the club could get creative with the walk ups. Cheaper kids maybe or group offers.
 
What data is this based on as a matter of interest?

Season tickets aren't good value. You just need to look up and down the league to see that.

You also haven't given any kind of basis for the comparison on why they're good value.

Matchday ticket pricing is scandalous and purely aimed at trying to force fans into purchasing season tickets when they aren't gvfm and often uneconomical given some people's circumstance. The club need to be more creative and understanding of the fans situation. Not everyone can afford a season ticket, not everyone can make night matches, some people works 6 weeks off etc. etc.
 
Season Cards from £390 on Wearside ..

View attachment 54348

I also see Sunderland had 2x tickets Adult for £20 for the Stoke game via certain outlets

Old habbits die hard haha

It's no wonder they manage to average such high attendances. It would be interesting to look at the demographics of their home support. I'd imagine a large percentage of their crowds are made up of kids, when you consider how cheap their kids tickets are.

I'm not knocking it though to be fair. As I said in my earlier post, I feel having an U16 pricing category is something we should consider doing. I've always disagreed with us only having the U18 price.
 
The vast majority of Adult SC holders paid £20 per match, many with a free drink.
No Pensioner paid more than £20 a match, most paid about £13.60 per match, many with a free drink.
1016 18-21's paid about £11 per match.
3030 Kids paid £7.50 per match outside the GRFZ.
1207 12-18 year olds paid £2.68 per match inside GRFZ.
894 U11's paid 46p per match in GRFZ.

They are ALL excellent value, some are too cheap.
If you can't see that, I'm not sure exactly what you are looking for.

The Match day prices are expensive, especially for Families, which I am sure is what stops more going.
The point of my post was to highlight how good value the SC's are, that Match prices are what is far too high, especially for kids, and that empty seats would be better filled by free kids places with adults around the stadium to fill the empty seats, rather than giving them away in an overly subsidised way in an expanded GRFZ.

It's all opinions I suppose.
I’ll say it again but £480 for the cheapest adult season ticket is at the very top end of what the other 23 teams in our division are offering for their cheapest adult season ticket.

That’s also before adding in you have to buy it before Easter too and it’s only for renewals otherwise it’s £544!
 
What data is this based on as a matter of interest?

Season tickets aren't good value. You just need to look up and down the league to see that.

You also haven't given any kind of basis for the comparison on why they're good value.

Matchday ticket pricing is scandalous and purely aimed at trying to force fans into purchasing season tickets when they aren't gvfm and often uneconomical given some people's circumstance. The club need to be more creative and understanding of the fans situation. Not everyone can afford a season ticket, not everyone can make night matches, some people works 6 weeks off etc. etc.
Totally disagree regarding season ticket prices. I paid £450 for this season @ 23 games amounts to £19.56 per game, including a free pint. Compared to Theatre tickets or concerts that price is definitely value for money. After watching the football we have seen this season it really helps, can you imagine watching the rubbish turned out under Strachen or Pulis for that amount. No doubt people would want a refund
 
Totally disagree regarding season ticket prices. I paid £450 for this season @ 23 games amounts to £19.56 per game, including a free pint. Compared to Theatre tickets or concerts that price is definitely value for money. After watching the football we have seen this season it really helps, can you imagine watching the rubbish turned out under Strachen or Pulis for that amount. No doubt people would want a refund
Why compare it to something completely different???

Compare it to Blackburn or Wigan or Sunderland season tickets and see how good value they are.

Burnley’s cheapest prices are much lower also and they are practically already up!

 
Last edited:
I agree (unsurprisingly) with Indeedido’s findings, great work btw too 👍

The cost of an SC is good value per game Imho. I wonder how many SC card holders are happy to pay £80 or so per ticket to watch the Arctic Monkeys, that moan about the pricing of a Boro event?

Those saying it is expensive when compared to Sunderland or say even a Preston, Rotherham or Blackburn. My view would be it is irrelevant as you wont go and watch them unless the Boro were in town. How many complaining about the SC per match cost are happy to spend a fair few quid on several beers with mates pre and post match without a second thought on their outlay?

Several hundred to a few thousand are happy to spend a fortune on travel, booze, food etc following the Boro away without too much complaint.

To put it into perspective for me, my travel and parking from Scarborough costs about a fiver a game more than my SC match cost, and I get a free drink thrown in too. The clubs energy prices will have rocketed, the increase, in hindsight, is actually less than inflation and very fair in my mind to watch the best football we have seen in a long, long time.

Value for money for the actual product experienced when compared to say Rotherham, Sunderland, and many others is surely decent at present. Merely comparing cost per game with other clubs is as odd as comparing the price of a pint in Boro to a pub in Norwich. It will differ as will the cost of petrol and many other products in different towns up and down the country.
 
I agree (unsurprisingly) with Indeedido’s findings, great work btw too 👍

The cost of an SC is good value per game Imho. I wonder how many SC card holders are happy to pay £80 or so per ticket to watch the Arctic Monkeys, that moan about the pricing of a Boro event?

Those saying it is expensive when compared to Sunderland or say even a Preston, Rotherham or Blackburn. My view would be it is irrelevant as you wont go and watch them unless the Boro were in town. How many complaining about the SC per match cost are happy to spend a fair few quid on several beers with mates pre and post match without a second thought on their outlay?

Several hundred to a few thousand are happy to spend a fortune on travel, booze, food etc following the Boro away without too much complaint.

To put it into perspective for me, my travel and parking from Scarborough costs about a fiver a game more than my SC match cost, and I get a free drink thrown in too. The clubs energy prices will have rocketed, the increase, in hindsight, is actually less than inflation and very fair in my mind to watch the best football we have seen in a long, long time.

Value for money for the actual product experienced when compared to say Rotherham, Sunderland, and many others is surely decent at present. Merely comparing cost per game with other clubs is as odd as comparing the price of a pint in Boro to a pub in Norwich. It will differ as will the cost of petrol and many other products in different towns up and down the country.

So just to be clear comparing it to the cost of going to see the arctic monkeys is a fair comparison but comparing it to the cost of other actual football matches is odd? 😃😉
 
So just to be clear comparing it to the cost of going to see the arctic monkeys is a fair comparison but comparing it to the cost of other actual football matches is odd? 😃😉
As I am sure you realise, it was a point about some people who may be happy to spend significantly more on a different one off entertainment event without batting an eyelid, clearly not a direct comparison. It was purely to suggest people can be fickle on what they perceive as acceptable pricing for entertainment.
 
Back
Top