London: Chris Kaba

dribble said:
Without all the facts ,how do you know ?
Click to expand...
The car was flagged on ANPR as being involved in a fire arms offence a couple of days earlier, it then flees from the police instead of stopping, they force it to stop the expectation is their is likely a weapon in the car, then the officer has a half second decision to make on any suspect movement if he’s wrong, him, a colleague or an innocent could be shot and killed, he determined the lesser risk was taking out the perpetrator. It’s a very difficult decision and an awful position to be put in. If the guy had stopped he wouldn’t of been shot.

Queue trial by media, political interference and point scoring by people who don’t understand reality.
 
Priv said:
The car was flagged on ANPR as being involved in a fire arms offence a couple of days earlier, it then flees from the police instead of stopping, they force it to stop the expectation is their is likely a weapon in the car, then the officer has a half second decision to make on any suspect movement if he’s wrong, him, a colleague or an innocent could be shot and killed, he determined the lesser risk was taking out the perpetrator. It’s a very difficult decision and an awful position to be put in. If the guy had stopped he wouldn’t of been shot.

Queue trial by media, political interference and point scoring by people who don’t understand reality.
Click to expand...
And you know all of this to be fact or are you surmising that’s what happened.
 
newusername said:
I would've thought, given there were no warnings & they deliberately killed an innocent man going to work, manslaughter.
Click to expand...
The 'no warnings' as you describe it, was deliberate and sanctioned from government across the UK, in the case of suspected suicide bombers.

It's obvious that any warning to a suicide bomber is futile and pointless, as it allows them to complete their intention.

I'm pretty sure you point is invalid.
 
newusername said:
You made some good points in your post but on this you are 100% wrong and it is because the police lied to control the narrative.

In the initial aftermath the Police released/leaked statements to the press that stated they'd challenged him outside of Stockwell tube, at which time he ran from them, jumped the barriers and ran onto the train. They pursued him & given his behaviour, heavy winter coat in the summer, backpack, and that he wasn't complying with shouted orders, they had to shoot him.

It turns out he'd been misidentified by an undercover officer as he left home, followed on the bus, he got off the bus & went to Brixton but it was closed, so got back on the bus & went to Stockwell, he picked up a Metro, paid for his travel with his Oyster, went through the barriers, walked down the escalator and at the bottom saw a tube in the platform and so ran to get on it and sat down. One undercover officer sat next to him and when firearms officers boarded the train he pinned him to the seat and de Menezes was shot, the officer let him go & he fell to floor and was shot again, in total 7 times in the head & once in the body, three other shots missed him. He was wearing a light denim jacket he didn't have a bag or rucksack with him, at no time was he given a chance to comply with Police orders because they didn't make any.



In the above case none of the undercover officers or three firearms officers which shot de Menezes faced any charges, and it wasn't that their behaviour was without fault.
Click to expand...
Thanks, this was very educational for me.
 
Facefuzz said:
Maybe he could have done both. Could have educated kids on not putting or getting themselves into the same situation which got his brother shot. That’s regardless of the outcome of the investigation

A decent teacher has such a big influence on a child who believes and trusts them
Click to expand...
Maybe he’ll return to teaching after the campaign.
I agree, early life is important to life outcomes.
 
Alex-The-Kid said:
This is such good news!
Click to expand...
Why ? oh hang on maybe its so that it fits in with what you said at the beginning of the thread.See below


(Clutching here Kosovo he was shot unarmed which is highly illegal. Don’t be surprised if the shooter is a privileged white male with right wing beliefs and voted for the Tory party. We need to rid ourselves of this dirge before it’s too late. Starting with PC shoots on sight.)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top