Avoid using wood burning stoves if possible, warn health experts
Charity calls for people to use alternative, less polluting heating and cooking options if they canwww.theguardian.com
it doesn’t matter if it’s wet wood or dry wood, you’re still releasing carbon back into the atmosphere that’s been stored up for years.
they need banning!
And they probably will eventually but it’s not going to happen soon principally because the proof is not overwhelming (as stated by Borolad above). At the moment people need them to keep warm in an energy crisis where heating via wood burner is for critical reasons and not because it is aesthetically nice to do soAvoid using wood burning stoves if possible, warn health experts
Charity calls for people to use alternative, less polluting heating and cooking options if they canwww.theguardian.com
it doesn’t matter if it’s wet wood or dry wood, you’re still releasing carbon back into the atmosphere that’s been stored up for years.
they need banning!
That is a must and should be checked regularly.Don’t forget a good quality carbon monoxide detector.
And they probably will eventually but it’s not going to happen soon principally because the proof is not overwhelming (as stated by Borolad above). At the moment people need them to keep warm in an energy crisis where heating via wood burner is for critical reasons and not because it is aesthetically nice to do so
In some circumstances they make total sense.And they probably will eventually but it’s not going to happen soon principally because the proof is not overwhelming (as stated by Borolad above). At the moment people need them to keep warm in an energy crisis where heating via wood burner is for critical reasons and not because it is aesthetically nice to do so
Sorry Brian, that arithmetic doesn’t work. Do you mean ‘contribute toward the rise caused by open fires’?You will personally increase the global temperature by 0.7 degrees centigrade every 235.498565 months, think about that as you're cooking toast on an open fire.
Sorry Brian, that arithmetic doesn’t work. Do you mean ‘contribute toward the rise caused by open fires’?
We run one all winter, but we have no mains gas and are pretty rural.
Yup, the draw is extremely important for fuel/ heat efficiency, as well as being able to get it lit properly and not filling the house with smoke, especially when it's cold and windy.I'd say just get it lined anyway for safety/draw. And when you go for a stove, I'd recommend Burley stoves. British made. Heavy steel plate as opposed to cast iron (often made from cheap slag), and extremely efficient/smokeless.
OK Brian, a little context. I am not a climate change denier, far from it. I voted Green back in the early 80's due to their environmental stance. As a vegetarian of 40 years and vegan for the last 3, I've tried to minimise my footprint wherever possible (though travelling a lot for work didn't help, I'm aware of that). I have solar panels, am currently investigating wind power within the strictures of the NYMNP planning regs, and will be replacing my diesel with an electric car.Do your own research, the information is out there if you look and avoid the MSM.
OK Brian, a little context. I am not a climate change denier, far from it. I voted Green back in the early 80's due to their environmental stance. As a vegetarian of 40 years and vegan for the last 3, I've tried to minimise my footprint wherever possible (though travelling a lot for work didn't help, I'm aware of that). I have solar panels, am currently investigating wind power within the strictures of the NYMNP planning regs, and will be replacing my diesel with an electric car.
My point was that your language suggested that every time someone lit an open fire (not sure where stoves fit in), they increased the Earth's temperature by 0.7 every 20 years. So, expanding this out, if 7,300 people (the number of days in 20 years) lit a fire, the temperature of the Earth would increase by .7 degrees? That's not correct, even if we said they lit one every day for 20 years. But you use of the term 'personally', suggested the former of these two possibilities.
I applaud that you are concerned with climate change, and accept that my log burner does add to global warming, but loose language only emboldens the deniers.
I am in the fortunate position that I have access to wood supply from my dad's farm. It is all barn dried to 20% and comes from fallen trees or snapped limbs from storms or simply dead trees. If the wood is just left to rot, it also releases carbon, doesn't it?Avoid using wood burning stoves if possible, warn health experts
Charity calls for people to use alternative, less polluting heating and cooking options if they canwww.theguardian.com
it doesn’t matter if it’s wet wood or dry wood, you’re still releasing carbon back into the atmosphere that’s been stored up for years.
they need banning!
Got me hook line and sinkerApologies, I wasn't being serious. I just posted some random made up statistics.