agreed, but the point made was 'Leadbitter and Woodgate are intellectuals?' They are in their field. Do they have the necessary communication, motivation, authority, empowerment, and other skills necessary to coach. They could be intellectuals in their own head but not able to articulate and share that. Mentoring, coaching and teaching are skillsBut managing/coaching is a completely different skill to playing the game. Being able to teach someone something is very different to being good at something. If it was that simple the best players would be the best managers but that's rarely the case.
How can anyone complain about having a leader and an absolute professional like Leadbitter involved atm!?
Adding to that our midfield is non existent… you’d think two top pros and top players in their own right, like Carrick and Leadbitter, would be just what the doctor ordered.
Totally agree with this.But managing/coaching is a completely different skill to playing the game. Being able to teach someone something is very different to being good at something. If it was that simple the best players would be the best managers but that's rarely the case.
Yeah totally agree, he was a great footballer.Agree although think he was actually pretty talented. His technique and range of passing was very good. Could hit a ball too.
What held him back a bit were his physical attributes. Not quick and not big and powerful. His talent wasn't quite enough to compensate for that at the highest level, but he had more natural talent than many who've made a career in the top flight.
Peak Leadbitter would probably have held his own in lower end mid table premier League side. But for players like him, somewhere between a top end championship player and lower end prem player, there's a bit of luck involved in being at the right club at the right time.
By the time we got up he had a big injury and was on the wane.
Yeah totally agree, he was a great footballer.
More thinking from the perspective of how people say truly world class players find it hard to coach, because they struggle to understand why players who are mere mortals can’t do what came naturally to them.
I’m not sure how true that is now though, Conte and Zidane have done alright. But for most of football history apart from a few outliers - Clough, Cruyff - the best managers were always relatively journeyman players.
Indisputable.Conte, Cruyff, Rijkaard, Guardiola, Beckenbauer, Ancelotti, Zidane, Luis Enrique, Deschamps, Dalglish.
There’s loads of top-class players who’ve gone on to be top-class, top-level coaches and managers and win a ridiculous number of trophies at both domestic and international level.
Agreed, but would say this is the thing we never really get to see. Leadbitter, Woodgate, whoever, need to want to develop and progress as coaches and we need to create an environment where they’re allowed to learn, fail, develop, improve.Indisputable.
As it is that a number of top class players have been abject failures.
I think it is obvious that excelling at something should give you a foundation and at least initial credibility, but unless you have the desire to keep learning and the skills to communicate, organise, motivate and lead many different types of people, then that reputational credibility will falter quickly.