AgreedA face I wouldn’t tire of punching.
Work harder for less pay.He says public sector productivity must rise by 0.5% a year at least.
WFT does that even mean?
Completely impossible to measure given the breadth of services the public sector provides though.Work harder for less pay.
NI cut by 2% from January.
Points to a May general election I reckon.
He says public sector productivity must rise by 0.5% a year at least.
WFT does that even mean?
NI cut by 2% from January.
Points to a May general election I reckon.
In fairness, hospitals are seeing fewer patients than they were pre-pandemic in Outpatients and Electives and are spending more money than they were (even adjusted or inflation) to do so. I know for example that we have some consultants that used to see 3 patients on a theatre list that had to change to 2 because of covid that have not gone back to 3 when others have. They have a 4 hour session, each patient takes 80 mins on average and they would rather waste the extra 80 mins every day than risk going over the 4 hours some days. The galling thing is that on their weekend lists that they do as extras they will see 4 patients and do them in 60 mins each because they are being paid per case instead of per session. There has always been a drive for productivity increases and there has always been a lot of waste/inefficiencies but covid has set Trusts back 5 years.He says public sector productivity must rise by 0.5% a year at least.
WFT does that even mean?
It obviously does not mean this.Work harder for less pay.
What does it mean then?It obviously does not mean this.
Yes it does.It obviously does not mean this.
Potentially, but there was talk this morning of further cuts to come in the Spring, maybe holding something (anything?) of significance back for then?Just a different way of saying spending cut, I reckon. Probably means hard wiring a further 0.5% annual cut in public spending below the rate of inflation.
I also smell a spring election.