Ipswich agree fee for Hackney, apparently

[uncle_rico]

According to social media. Rumoured to be £15m after add ons.

I just cannot see that being true.

 

[uncle_rico]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1950310586086011131

 

[MFCJ]

15 mil after add ons deary me !! What's going on with the club. Hopefully this not true, however it sounds like its happening.

 

[TeaCider]

It would be a very worrying sign for the state of the club's finances right now if that figure was accurate and they accepted it.

Would seem such a desperately low offer to be accepted that I don't believe it.

 

[Ravshoutsatbeck]

According to social media. Rumoured to be £15m after add ons.

I just cannot see that being true.

Two days ago we weren't willing to sell for 20... now a cut price deal.

Seems a bit mad.

I've always thought Hackney would go for less than 20m and make fans mad, but 15 after add ons would be low enough that I couldn't defend the club.

 

[newyddion]

According to social media. Rumoured to be £15m after add ons.

I just cannot see that being true.

Maybe we have a big sell on clause?

 

[Boro_Interlinked]

That's the fee to talk to him .. long road ahead on this yet

 

[MFCJ]

That's the fee to talk to him .. long road ahead on this yet

Why are we allowing our best player talk to a rival club for 15 mi? It makes no sense to me.

 

[ForssAwakens]

15 mil is hackneys value, but not with add ons imo

 

[Sheriff_John_Bunnell_ret]

Ballsacks.

 

[MoggasDog]

Shi.te.
We will never know the fee - that's how it is, these days.
But, I suspect that making the Ipswich bid public is an open message to any other interested teams to get their bids in, if they're serious.

 

[MFCJ]

15 mil is hackneys value, but not with add ons imo

Alex Scott went to Bournemouth for 25 mil from Bristol city

 

[GibbosEmpire]

We always seem to sell short

 

[Paulh10]

If it's a 20 m deal fair enough but doesn't make sense for him to go to another championship team or us selling toa rival.I think McCabe can be his replacement.

 

[Boro4life]

I don't believe it to be true

 

[AytonMews]

Will pay for Bamford with £5m left over for a couple more left backs

 

[ForssAwakens]

Alex Scott went to Bournemouth for 25 mil from Bristol city

Scott was 19 therefore potential can sometimes be higher and attract higher fee

Hackney has only two years on his contract

Hackney is behind Scott in the u21 team

 

[MichaelDebeve]

Great deal for all parties, enables us to bring the Bam back

 

[Sheriff_John_Bunnell_ret]

One day there's going to be a discussion about transfer fees in which someone doesn't mention Alex Scott. It'll be in about 2077.

 

[TeaCider]

Scott was 19 therefore potential can sometimes be higher and attract higher fee

Hackney has only two years on his contract

Hackney is behind Scott in the u21 team

Scott only had 2 years left on his contract too.

But I agree that he was a higher rated and more valuable player.

Transfer inflation has went up even in the 2 years since his sale though, I don't believe we're selling Hackney for only £15m, somebody on the Ipswich end has been misinformed.