OK, I generally agree. It comes down to what level of risk we accept for ourselves. I suppose what makes the difference is, do we think taking the vaccine is safer than not taking it which, lets face it, isn't without risks either. I think those not getting the vac will have to accept that social distancing, furlough etc. won't be extended just because they don't want the vaccine, therefore their risk of at least contracting the virus will be higher than it is now.
The point about selfishness is interesting; I think it would be easy to dismiss non-vaccers as only a risk to other non-vaccers (if you've been vaccinated, the worst they can do is give it to each other, not to you, right?). I think that argument falls down because no vaccine so far has been 100% effective and because some will have medical reasons for not being able to take the vaccine. There will be some who therefore want, or take, the vaccine who will still be vulnerable.
I don't think that's going to convince any non-vaccers to get it though.