Urban_Legend
Member
Driving round a bend at the top of a hill on full lock, I tried to go right, but my car continued sliding forwards and slammed into the kerb. The offside front wheel buckled. I was told, without it being properly assessed, that I'd broken the steering arm, steering rack, wishbone and damaged the sub frame.
The insurance company wouldn't get it looked at because of the age of the car, so wrote it off. I was pleased that they valued the car at pre-accident trade price. I couldn't afford not to have a car if I'd decided to get it repaired myself, as it would mean I wouldn't be able to get to work, so I've taken their offer and a salvage company are coming to take it away at some point this week.
Other than the wheel, the car is in really good condition. I bought it off a family member, who bought it from new, so I knew its full history. I've looked after it well; there's barely a scratch or dent on it, it is immaculate inside and it's been regularly serviced. It's a 13-year-old motor and it's only done 64000 miles. I'm devastated to see it go.
I've just been and emptied it of my possessions before it's picked tomorrow. It breaks my heart knowing that somebody mechanically minded is going to pick it up for a song. As it was not properly examined, the damage that was suggested may not even be accurate, and may end up being a cheap and easy fix. So...
Is it unethical to make the damage worse than it is, so the car isn't as desirable as it is at the moment? I feel like slashing the tyres, cracking the windscreen and denting every panel, so it becomes more expensive to fix. The car still has half a tank of petrol too, so I'd like to stick a screwdriver through the tank to siphen off and fill my new(er) motor with it.
The insurance company have not looked at it, so how would they know, and would they really care?
The insurance company wouldn't get it looked at because of the age of the car, so wrote it off. I was pleased that they valued the car at pre-accident trade price. I couldn't afford not to have a car if I'd decided to get it repaired myself, as it would mean I wouldn't be able to get to work, so I've taken their offer and a salvage company are coming to take it away at some point this week.
Other than the wheel, the car is in really good condition. I bought it off a family member, who bought it from new, so I knew its full history. I've looked after it well; there's barely a scratch or dent on it, it is immaculate inside and it's been regularly serviced. It's a 13-year-old motor and it's only done 64000 miles. I'm devastated to see it go.
I've just been and emptied it of my possessions before it's picked tomorrow. It breaks my heart knowing that somebody mechanically minded is going to pick it up for a song. As it was not properly examined, the damage that was suggested may not even be accurate, and may end up being a cheap and easy fix. So...
Is it unethical to make the damage worse than it is, so the car isn't as desirable as it is at the moment? I feel like slashing the tyres, cracking the windscreen and denting every panel, so it becomes more expensive to fix. The car still has half a tank of petrol too, so I'd like to stick a screwdriver through the tank to siphen off and fill my new(er) motor with it.
The insurance company have not looked at it, so how would they know, and would they really care?