Andy_W
Well-known member
Nobody is paying £120m for Rashford, and £60m would also be insane.
He doesn't score enough, he's not a great winger and most of the time he's been second fiddle to other players who were not that great either.
His contract is up next year too. They would probably take a £30m bid, and could find a better player for that, if not he'll be off next year for £0.
He's also on 200k a week, and nowhere is going to give him that either, even if he left on a free.
He may have been worth £50m a few years back, when he was still younger and most would have saw some potential, but if anything he's got worse each year.
His best year was 19-20, but even that year he was outscored by Martial, who is almost as overrated.
Man City got Haaland for ~£50m, and although that was a buy-out clause they still got him for £55m, it looks like it's going to be the deal of the century, he's going to destroy the league.
He doesn't score enough, he's not a great winger and most of the time he's been second fiddle to other players who were not that great either.
His contract is up next year too. They would probably take a £30m bid, and could find a better player for that, if not he'll be off next year for £0.
He's also on 200k a week, and nowhere is going to give him that either, even if he left on a free.
He may have been worth £50m a few years back, when he was still younger and most would have saw some potential, but if anything he's got worse each year.
His best year was 19-20, but even that year he was outscored by Martial, who is almost as overrated.
Man City got Haaland for ~£50m, and although that was a buy-out clause they still got him for £55m, it looks like it's going to be the deal of the century, he's going to destroy the league.
