Not so, however. As I suspected might happen, based on the precedent of the Chauvin trial, the judge has turned down her request.I wasnt aware of that. New trial incoming I suspect.
Not so, however. As I suspected might happen, based on the precedent of the Chauvin trial, the judge has turned down her request.I wasnt aware of that. New trial incoming I suspect.
The only real question there is "is the judges decision reversible" I suspect that it is and will be reversed on appeal. Let's wait and see. I don't believe it had any effect on the jury, as in the Chauvin case. However, I am not sure the appellate court can take that view, as they simply don't know.Not so, however. As I suspected might happen, based on the precedent of the Chauvin trial, the judge has turned down her request.
What makes you think it's reversible? What legal error did the judge make here?The only real question there is "is the judges decision reversible" I suspect that it is and will be reversed on appeal.
Not long enough, wonder if she'll squeal or write a memoir?Ghislaine Maxwell sentenced to 20 years in prison for sex trafficking crimes
Maxwell’s attorneys had pushed for leniency after 60-year-old was convicted in US in December of five of the six charges she facedwww.theguardian.com
why do you think that - shes been there a long time alreadySham trial.
She won't even go to prison.
Yes and Epstien killed himself, in solitary confinement, whilst the cameras were off.why do you think that - shes been there a long time already
FFS Randy you really are sniffing the crotches of the conspiracy nutjobs' heavily soiled undercrackers.Yes and Epstien killed himself, in solitary confinement, whilst the cameras were off.
With what she knows, names, travel schedules, financial transactions etc she's definitely squealed and is now more than likely in witness protection.
Yes and Epstien killed himself, in solitary confinement, whilst the cameras were off.
With what she knows, names, travel schedules, financial transactions etc she's definitely squealed and is now more than likely in witness protection.
Aye.20 years bro...
She probably realises the only chance she has of not accidentally getting her neck caught in a noose is keeping her mouth shut.I'm amazed she's not pulled a plea deal out from somewhere. I can't believe an educated and intelligent women hasn't kept records or list of names etc.
I imagine she could drop so many past and present 'celebs' and important people in the sh*t.
I think it is screamingly obvious that Epstein was probably "offed" and in the light of that it is unsurprising that Gizzy's memory was a trifle vague on details and names. It is sensible to be sceptical about the "news" but you also have to be logical about what is happening. For Maxwell to be allowed into "Witness Protection" there would have to be so many people in the loop but required to keep quiet it is just fanciful.Ah but it's all been reported on the news so it must be true right?