Well at least you watched it and criticised, I always thought AN was a fair minded bloke over the years, but it seems his right wing political views have been bottled up and finally exploded out.
For someone who loves impartiality, was the broadcasting impartial?
wahey
What? The flagship news presenter for GBNews is broadcasting from the Riviera? “Surely shome mishtake?”
too early to say but I can see that you have made your mind up.
really? His biases make it pretty difficult for him to approach topics with any impartiality, or even a modicum of fairness. He's always a bit of a bully when it suits him as others have said.
If any even remotely capable interviewer had got hold of him at the last GE it would have exposed his weakness and ineptitude....that's why he hid in a fridge.
they'll either massively bend the rules or break them and disband immediately after, 'the Analytica' approach to avoiding law.
that's the idea isn't it? It's a republican funded project to spread white/right wing hate, appose progressiveness, fairness, equality and levelling up.
indirectly yes for the richest people on the planet, by pushing right wing, low tax economies, and libertarianism to stop regulations that might stop the very rich from further exploitation of the masses. That is the true vision not maximise how much money they get from Co-Op and Carphone Warehouse.
I'd consider my life a failure if my job was to bully people, particularly people who don't like to see the rich getting richer while the poor get poorer.
His involvement in The Spectator and The Daily Mail should disqualify him from that. But probably more importantly his anti-science stances i.e. doesn't believe in global warming and doesn't believe HIV causes AIDS, and airs these views in print despite not being a scientist.
Yes. I guess we all need to look at who benefits and loses because of the industries we work in - and the part we play in that process.
So for some one who welcomes an alternative view, were those with alternative views well represented?
Of course, however most of us are not able to make the decision on how to feed our family based on ethical grounds, we have to do what we can to keep food on our table. He could literally choose what editorial or political presenting job and how he does. He chooses The Daily Mail, The Spectator and a propaganda station and to be a bully and misinformationist which is his behaviour not job.
I watched for about 20 minutes earlier and yes. Did you watch the news this morning? Was it the same for you?
I haven't had time yet. But I will watch at some point.
As I mentioned earlier, I watched for 20 minutes. They were talking about the booing at Wembley yesterday. One of the presenters said "Although I don't support BLM, why do these people continue to boo". There was then an interview with Priti Patel talking about immigration. She didn't say anything that I haven't heard elsewhere.
