Howson even looks towards the red straight away cos he sees it. Tav barely celebrates.
NoWeemoby, Holgate, BoroBen, did you watch the post match analysis on Quest?
Ok I will see if I can find it on catch up.If you watch that you will see it! 100%
Ok I will see if I can find it on catch up.
Still think the ref guessed though, far too fast at normal speed for anyone to be sure.
99 times out of 100 that penalty would have stood and nobody from Norwich would have complained.
The ref wasn’t so shxt hot that he failed to see the second yellow ( he lied about that to Warnock in my opinion) and on the Norwich forum there is one of their posters saying that their player deliberately put his foot in place so Coulson had to foul him.
So three marginal decisions against us and nothing for us, what does that say about the ref?
Qualification of that statement is required. (Lack of an emoji makes it impossible for me to decide if you're mucking about. That and the FACT that fact isn't in caps)........................ But what I will say is the referee has never liked the boro. And I know that for a fact.
Qualification of that statement is required. (Lack of an emoji makes it impossible for me to decide if you're mucking about. That and the FACT that fact isn't in caps)
I think he had a hidden agenda with the Tav penalty, I can only speculate as to what it was but he saw the opportunity to disallow the goal because Tav had slipped and he very quickly grabbed it with both hands.I think the ref got all the decisions correct apart from the Folarin one. But what I will say is the referee has never liked the boro. And I know that for a fact.
He def tried to play the oh he gave that decision against warnock cardI think the ref guessed in favour of Norwich, maybe trying to make a name for himself with a controversial decision against Neil Warnock at the Riverside, but I agree with you about the Folarin and Coulson incidents.
Yeah.100% a double touch. The idea the ref was desperate to disallow is laughable really. And their penalty was a result of some pathetic defending from Coulsen, absolutely no need to dangle your leg out like that
100% a double touch. The idea the ref was desperate to disallow is laughable really. And their penalty was a result of some pathetic defending from Coulsen, absolutely no need to dangle your leg out like that
I suppose you were happy with Krol off his line? The defender encroaching? Their player not getting a second yellow for a professional foul?100% a double touch. The idea the ref was desperate to disallow is laughable really. And their penalty was a result of some pathetic defending from Coulsen, absolutely no need to dangle your leg out like that
Only reason I’m advocating mate is because I have seen it. There is a video on Instagram one job on teeeside the account is called and if you zoom in you can see it touched his right foot and diverts towards the middle of the goal. I am sure Warnock will get asked about it again and clear it up. The decision not send Sorensen off though was shambolic. I am gutted as anyone about what happened with the penalty but I can’t not be honest. I have seen the ball hit his right foot. And as for Heam, I don’t think he’s a troll. He’s been a decent poster on here for a while.for those of you advocating the double touch, can you tell us where and how it occurs
because i just cannot see it. Block i usually agree with most things you say but cannot understand your so adamant on this. Heam im not too sure hes not a geordie troll .
Its clear from behind that he strikes the ball with his left foot as hes slipping, but his right foot slides under his left foot after hes struck it and makes no contact on the ball.
Im p****d that the referee makes that decision, Krull made no reaction until he saw the ref make his decision,.
Tav was dumbfounded hed slipped and did protest as did others but play carried on quickly so they had to get back into the game. The law is there to stop a player dribbling forward. He gained no advantage. As others have pointed out if the referee is applying the rules then equally retake as Krull off his line and also an infringement in the box.
All in all we can discuss it till the cows come home it will make no difference now. But it is an awful decision and smacks of nepotism. ( he also should have booked Sorenson for the blatant body check and then followed with a red ) that was even more blatant nepotism