1finny
Well-known member
I’m sure I read The Reform Party are footing the bill as NF called for the bi election.That's a can of worms Burnham won't want to open. He's just put the taxpayers of Manchester on the hook for over £4 million.
I’m sure I read The Reform Party are footing the bill as NF called for the bi election.That's a can of worms Burnham won't want to open. He's just put the taxpayers of Manchester on the hook for over £4 million.
Don't think they canI’m sure I read The Reform Party are footing the bill as NF called for the bi election.
I’m sure I read The Reform Party are footing the bill as NF called for the bi election.
Both of the precedents I'm aware of have similarities to the Farage case. Lord Chelsea (1842) was facing an intensive parliamentary committee investigation into alleged electoral corruption, bribery, and compromised election pacts in his constituency. He sought the Chiltern Hundreds as a quick escape mechanism to avoid answering to the committee and to bury the investigation. The Chancellor refused the request, arguing that granting the office would effectively facilitate a compromise to evade justice and bring the House into disrepute.Also there is precedent (albeit very old) that the Chancellor could refuse his appointment to one of the nominal houses, therefore preventing the by-election, on the grounds of believing the attempt is to avoid financial scrutiny.
They could but it wouldnt suit anybody to do that. I prefer that he hangs by his own petardBoth of the precedents I'm aware of have similarities to the Farage case. Lord Chelsea (1842) was facing an intensive parliamentary committee investigation into alleged electoral corruption, bribery, and compromised election pacts in his constituency. He sought the Chiltern Hundreds as a quick escape mechanism to avoid answering to the committee and to bury the investigation. The Chancellor refused the request, arguing that granting the office would effectively facilitate a compromise to evade justice and bring the House into disrepute.
James Sadleir fled the country to avoid fraud allegations (1856). The Government committed on the record to refusing any potential application he might make for the Chiltern Hundreds, ensuring he could not dictate his exit on his own terms. Instead, Parliament chose to formally expel him.
21.2k votes for NF, 24.7k votes against NF. It is doable...Is there a chance, any chance, that it could be Farage vs Binface, and Farage doesn’t win? Surely if all non-Reform voters voted for the only other option we could have the greatest political result in the history of the the country? It would make all of this worth it.
| Name | Party | Vote | Vote share | Vote change |
| FARAGE, Nigel | RUK | 21,225 | 46.20% | - |
| WATLING, Giles | Con | 12,820 | 27.90% | -44.00% |
| OWUSU-NEPAUL, Jovan | Lab | 7,448 | 16.20% | 0.60% |
| BENSILUM, Matthew | LD | 2,016 | 4.40% | -1.80% |
| OSBEN, Natasha | Green | 1,935 | 4.20% | 1.30% |
| MACK, Tony | Ind | 317 | 0.70% | - |
| PEMBERTON, Andrew | UKIP | 116 | 0.30% | - |
| JAMIESON, Craig | Cli | 48 | 0.10% | - |
| PAPANASTASIOU, Tasos | HPUK | 33 | 0.10% | - |
Just sat here for 20 minutes thinking about it & laughing. It would be my faith in British democracy restored.21.2k votes for NF, 24.7k votes against NF. It is doable...
Name Party Vote Vote share Vote change FARAGE, Nigel RUK 21,225 46.20% - WATLING, Giles Con 12,820 27.90% -44.00% OWUSU-NEPAUL, Jovan Lab 7,448 16.20% 0.60% BENSILUM, Matthew LD 2,016 4.40% -1.80% OSBEN, Natasha Green 1,935 4.20% 1.30% MACK, Tony Ind 317 0.70% - PEMBERTON, Andrew UKIP 116 0.30% - JAMIESON, Craig Cli 48 0.10% - PAPANASTASIOU, Tasos HPUK 33 0.10% -
Just to keep the glass ‘half full’ - it is widely reported his support in Clacton has declined too.Just sat here for 20 minutes thinking about it & laughing. It would be my faith in British democracy restored.
This is more likely.and he swans off with his millions and is invited onto the likes of Question Time and other platforms with monotonous regularity.
Quite possibly, but I'm not sure thick skinned is the right description after his behaviour this week. He looks incredibly thin skinned when finally exposed to a bit of scrutiny and isn't allowed to set the agenda.Just to keep the glass ‘half full’ - it is widely reported his support in Clacton has declined too.
Then the conspiracy kicks in - does he really want to win?
He loses…. a short term barrage of laughing from the likes of us - and he swans off with his millions and appears on the likes of Question Time and other platforms with monotonous regularity.
He is thick skinned.
I think if that was the plan he would have just stepped down and waffled on about protecting his family playing the victim.Just to keep the glass ‘half full’ - it is widely reported his support in Clacton has declined too.
Then the conspiracy kicks in - does he really want to win?
He loses…. a short term barrage of laughing from the likes of us - and he swans off with his millions and appears on the likes of Question Time and other platforms with monotonous regularity.
He is thick skinned.
The chances improve with a low turnout if his supporters think there’s no need to show up. It would ruin the whole “will of the people” rhetoric too as they would see that even in his own constituency, more people don’t want him than do. Even a small drop in voting share would be damaging with fewer candidates.21.2k votes for NF, 24.7k votes against NF. It is doable...
Name Party Vote Vote share Vote change FARAGE, Nigel RUK 21,225 46.20% - WATLING, Giles Con 12,820 27.90% -44.00% OWUSU-NEPAUL, Jovan Lab 7,448 16.20% 0.60% BENSILUM, Matthew LD 2,016 4.40% -1.80% OSBEN, Natasha Green 1,935 4.20% 1.30% MACK, Tony Ind 317 0.70% - PEMBERTON, Andrew UKIP 116 0.30% - JAMIESON, Craig Cli 48 0.10% - PAPANASTASIOU, Tasos HPUK 33 0.10% -
Firk his daughterRe his daughter.. Farage has said that he has always tried to protect his family and keep them out of the media.
Anyway here a pic of Nige on I’m a Celebrity with……. checks notes……. His daughter!