Brexit, more cheek from the UK.

It surely can't be a "breach of EU law" if we already allow Australia, Canada, Japan, New Zealand, the US, Singapore and South Korea to do it. Although they are well within their rights to refuse it, it doesn't look good to claim it's not possible if it already happens in some cases.
 
It surely can't be a "breach of EU law" if we already allow Australia, Canada, Japan, New Zealand, the US, Singapore and South Korea to do it. Although they are well within their rights to refuse it, it doesn't look good to claim it's not possible if it already happens in some cases.
It looks to me that whoever wrote that article is mixing up two different things - the EU and the Schengen agreement.

The quotes given in the article make it clear that this is to do with the Schengen agreement, not with EU law:
The Schengen border code is restrictive on this
[...]
It is understood that the commission called in representatives of the member states for a presentation on “treating UK nationals at the Schengen borders”

In the UK we can do things differently because we're not part of the Schengen agreement.
 
Passport control (click for article)

View attachment 7821
I better many people who vote leave want this too, talk about cake and eat it, and there are many worse things to come. This is what you voted for, you'll just have to get on with it and enjoy your Brexit and a blue passport with a worse deal then what we had with the benefits of being a member, but yes ok you got your way, we can keep out those foreigners who were to blame of all our problems.
Tories are hilarious. They are now realising long waits at airports for their gammons and know it’ll hurt them as people get pi$$ed off taking an hour Each way! just to get out and back into the country 👍👍 and the business community will also pile derision on this‘government’ having to wait for ages to get in and out. All things the goves of this world dismissed as rubbish when the referendum was voted on
To$$ers
 
Someone else waiting for people to die. I find it appalling.

You've totally taken that out of context, and conveniently ignored my main points. This is typical for your type of response, to divert away from reality, but just to break your "point" down.

Why is that appalling? Wanting the world to progress, and move away from xenophobic times is appalling? Wanting the world to be more inclusive and better for all humanity is appalling? You need to give your head a shake, and get with the changing times.

Also, what I've said is nowhere near as bad as pushing for brexit, which:
This goes against what most businesses want, which is proven.
Going against business is generally not going to be good for our competition with Europe and our economy.
Bad for business = lost jobs or less growth
That equals worse quality of life, and more earlier deaths (less tax = less money for essential services).
When that happens, this ends up being worse for those most at risk or worse off, or from areas highlighted to struggle the most.
So old, low earners, up in the north east are effectively the most at risk.
It's them and those others that are at risk who I'm actually trying to help the most.
What is appalling is voting for something that is highly likely to damage our area
What is appalling is voting against immigration, which is a proven net benefit per person, and business need it to grow
What is appalling is voting for a party that doesn't care about our area
What is appalling is voting for a party that doesn't care about those most at risk

If the economy gets worse through brexit or a long drawing out pandemic response (through people ignoring other experts, like medical experts) then this equals more actual deaths, what I want is actually for everyone to live longer, and have a better life.
 
You've totally taken that out of context, and conveniently ignored my main points. This is typical for your type of response, to divert away from reality, but just to break your "point" down.

Why is that appalling? Wanting the world to progress, and move away from xenophobic times is appalling? Wanting the world to be more inclusive and better for all humanity is appalling? You need to give your head a shake, and get with the changing times.

Also, what I've said is nowhere near as bad as pushing for brexit, which:
This goes against what most businesses want, which is proven.
Going against business is generally not going to be good for our competition with Europe and our economy.
Bad for business = lost jobs or less growth
That equals worse quality of life, and more earlier deaths (less tax = less money for essential services).
When that happens, this ends up being worse for those most at risk or worse off, or from areas highlighted to struggle the most.
So old, low earners, up in the north east are effectively the most at risk.
It's them and those others that are at risk who I'm actually trying to help the most.
What is appalling is voting for something that is highly likely to damage our area
What is appalling is voting against immigration, which is a proven net benefit per person, and business need it to grow
What is appalling is voting for a party that doesn't care about our area
What is appalling is voting for a party that doesn't care about those most at risk

If the economy gets worse through brexit or a long drawing out pandemic response (through people ignoring other experts, like medical experts) then this equals more actual deaths, what I want is actually for everyone to live longer, and have a better life.
If it's out of context why did you need to bring it into your argument?

Your words to be fair are no where near those used by others on the other board.

It seems to me ageism is the only acceptable ism on here.
 
If it's out of context why did you need to bring it into your argument?

Your words to be fair are no where near those used by others on the other board.

It seems to me ageism is the only acceptable ism on here.
What other -isms would you like to be acceptable?
 
What other -isms would you like to be acceptable?
Harry I have been consistent in this since the start.

If you think it's right that's fine, it seems very wrong to me.

Very strangely as I typed 'to me ' the word checker changed it to my dad's name. A teary moment.
 
There won’t be anyone flying or travelling when the economic damage is done from Covid and the lockdowns and restrictions anyway.

Spent 6 months stressing about my job, being told I’m getting made redundant every day etc. We all took a 5% pay cut negotiated by the union and still some of my colleagues and friends lost their jobs, then 22 days after our pay cut kicked in we had a email today to say they have to make more redundancies. Stressed would be a understatement.

Welcome to the real world. This has been the norm for many, particularly in this part of the country since 'permanent' employees were discouraged by a philosophy we adopted in the 70s and still run with today.
 
There won’t be anyone flying or travelling when the economic damage is done from Covid and the lockdowns and restrictions anyway.

Spent 6 months stressing about my job, being told I’m getting made redundant every day etc. We all took a 5% pay cut negotiated by the union and still some of my colleagues and friends lost their jobs, then 22 days after our pay cut kicked in we had a email today to say they have to make more redundancies. Stressed would be a understatement.

Sorry to hear that UKLL- Unfortunately this has been a fact of economic life on a daily basis for the last 40 years. Zero hour contracts, agency work. part time this, contract that. Sacked for no valid reason (I was once sacked for being a member of a union, another time my managers brother was leaving the army and needed a job-I was "let go" as blood is thicker than water.) Going to work and not knowing if you have a job the following day or week. Flexible working, funny how flexibility only bends one way. Unfair dismissal cases costing each dismissed person £1000 to fight.
Unions have had their hands ties behind their backs to fight these wrongs.
 
You've totally taken that out of context, and conveniently ignored my main points. This is typical for your type of response, to divert away from reality, but just to break your "point" down.

Why is that appalling? Wanting the world to progress, and move away from xenophobic times is appalling? Wanting the world to be more inclusive and better for all humanity is appalling? You need to give your head a shake, and get with the changing times.

Also, what I've said is nowhere near as bad as pushing for brexit, which:
This goes against what most businesses want, which is proven.
Going against business is generally not going to be good for our competition with Europe and our economy.
Bad for business = lost jobs or less growth
That equals worse quality of life, and more earlier deaths (less tax = less money for essential services).
When that happens, this ends up being worse for those most at risk or worse off, or from areas highlighted to struggle the most.
So old, low earners, up in the north east are effectively the most at risk.
It's them and those others that are at risk who I'm actually trying to help the most.
What is appalling is voting for something that is highly likely to damage our area
What is appalling is voting against immigration, which is a proven net benefit per person, and business need it to grow
What is appalling is voting for a party that doesn't care about our area
What is appalling is voting for a party that doesn't care about those most at risk

If the economy gets worse through brexit or a long drawing out pandemic response (through people ignoring other experts, like medical experts) then this equals more actual deaths, what I want is actually for everyone to live longer, and have a better life.
Taking things out if context seems to be all the go.
See thread
More meanness and bile from The Nasty Party
 
Back
Top