Yes smart **** this was deep into the gameI suspect there was a stage when we had 100% possession too
And
A time when we had zero possession
Well it worked didn’t itA lot of that possession was just them passing it between defenders and keeper and not going anywhere
He said 30% at one point i.e cumulatively at that particular stage in the game. Possession stats are updated in real time so not 'blatantly untrue' as you put it.Fulham lost at home with 65% possession whilst Derby won at home with 32% possession. Possession stats can be greatly misleading and ultimately mean nothing when it comes to allocating the points. That being said, we had 49% possession so the 30% claim is blatantly untrue.
Very true but our lack of possession is every weekPossession stats are meaningless, transient ones doubly so, teams can and do win games with low possession stats. Nothing to get annoyed or upset about.
What gets me agitated is the way that teams continue to drive unchallenged through our central midfield. And our vanishing full backs. On a positive I like Sporar, Siliki looks a good player who just needs to adjust to the speed of the championship. Oh and Payero looks more ready to start. So move Johnny Howson to RB.
We are in transition, we are unlikely to trouble the top six but we won't go down either. Next season, new manager and hopefully on board with a consistent vision of how we play and develop our players and squad. It's just great being able to watch football with a crowd again.
(Low "expectations" really help sometimes)
We'll you're either being facetious or you lack a basic knowledge of how possession stats are calculated and displayed in game.I suspect there was a stage when we had 100% possession too
And
A time when we had zero possession