I'll say it again & again, it's the worst thing to be brought in to football, it won't be binned & will continue to cause contraversy, season after seasonLewandowski brought down in box clear foul ref blows and he told to place ball on spot ready to take pen then ref blows and gives offside so pen is cancelled following var check.
No one had a clue what’s going on.
I suppose it was only a farce on this occasion if he wasn't offside. If he was offside then it's an example of VAR doing its job correctly.Lewandowski brought down in box clear foul ref blows and he told to place ball on spot ready to take pen then ref blows and gives offside so pen is cancelled following var check.
No one had a clue what’s going on.
I'll say it again & again, it's the worst thing to be brought in to football, it won't be binned & will continue to cause contraversy, season after season
Yep, something needs to be doneThat’s what you need, some Lee way to
Interpret the outcome in a sensible coherent manner not follow it religiously as in 2mm of his left fore arm is offside from this still image so no goal.
Couldn't agree more, when football was once instant, now wait 5 minutes before celebratingRuins the game completely. I'd far rather we just lived with the ref's mistakes than have to stand around for 5 minutes while they watch umpteen slo-mos.
That’s what you need, some Lee way to
Interpret the outcome in a sensible coherent manner not follow it religiously as in 2mm of his left fore arm is offside from this still image so no goal.
It's
It's really easy to do in the instance of offside.
If you need to zoom in on the picture and it isn't obvious from the full sized still image then the benefit goes to the attacker and he's onside.
The farcical scenario is where they're zooming in and debating about whether 2 pixels show he was off.
Crazy & not neededIt's
It's really easy to do in the instance of offside.
If you need to zoom in on the picture and it isn't obvious from the full sized still image then the benefit goes to the attacker and he's onside.
The farcical scenario is where they're zooming in and debating about whether 2 pixels show he was off.
Silly & they call that improving the gameIt’s also inaccurate, which is the most important thing.
They are pretending that it’s possible to measure a 3D dynamic situation using 2D camera technology from an angle to within that level of accuracy. It isn’t, it’s an estimate.