uncle_rico
Well-known member
This seems inevitable now and there are some usually reputable sources claiming that this could come into force as early as tomorrow.
Chief medical officer doesn’t believe it is worth doing - reported this morning. Says it is an unnecessary step and stops people enjoying what they want to do
And then whose that aren't at risk go home to their family, some of whom may be old or have underlying health conditions?Just stop those at risk going ffs.... how many people die of flu every year ??
That would only work if you say those not at risk and will not come into any contact with people who are are allowed to go. In other words nobody except the lonely.Just stop those at risk going ffs.... how many people die of flu every year ??
Public Health England estimates that on average 17,000 people die from the flu each year in England. This virus has approximately 30 times the fatality rate of the flu according to the latest WHO figures. So even if it only spread at the same rate as the flu, it would kill over half a million people.Just stop those at risk going ffs.... how many people die of flu every year ??
Public Health England estimates that on average 17,000 people die from the flu each year in England. This virus has approximately 30 times the fatality rate of the flu according to the latest WHO figures. So even if it only spread at the same rate as the flu, it would kill over half a million people.
However, it's also more contagious than the flu, with each patient infecting on average 3 others compared to 1.3 for flu.
Several health experts have said that if left unchecked it could end up infecting as much as 80% of the population. So if you want something over 1.3 millon people in England (and over 1.6 million in the UK) to die of this, then by all means, let's not take any measures to try to prevent it spreading.