A tragic case or a deserved sentence?

Was a prison sentence justified in this case?

  • Yes

    Votes: 43 58.9%
  • No

    Votes: 30 41.1%

  • Total voters
    73
There was no need for her reaction and whilst the sentence may seem over the top.. so is losing your life after riding a bike on a shared cycle path.

3 years to think about not being a complete pillock to people.
 
Absolutely not - I’m surprised this has even gone to court. Yes it’s unfortunate and a very sad case but given the lady in the bike moves to the road after they pass I’m not even sure why the other lady is at fault. A bad attitude and lack of remorse are not crimes.
I fully expect her to win her appeal.
 
There was no need for her reaction and whilst the sentence may seem over the top.. so is losing your life after riding a bike on a shared cycle path.

3 years to think about not being a complete pillock to people.
I think it states it’s unconfirmed whether it’s a shared cycle path.
 
I can't tell from the video whether she touched the cyclist. She must have done, surely?
 
I can't tell from the video whether she touched the cyclist. She must have done, surely?
I think that would have been mentioned if she did - assuming for a minute she didn’t touch her - what’s your view?
 
I can't tell from the video whether she touched the cyclist. She must have done, surely?
You can’t, but you can see she made a move, which triggered the swerve which ended up in the lady losing her life. When I was on jury duty for a manslaughter the judge in his summing up said ‘if any of the accused‘s actions or inactions caused this death then you MUST find him guilty’. So guilty then, sentence in my view, fair.
 
She has cerebral palsy, is partially sighted and it’s not clear it was a shared cycle path/pavement

It’s not particularly wide and her conditions could well mean she needs extra space given she can’t move or see well so I’m surprised she was convicted of manslaughter
 
I think that would have been mentioned if she did - assuming for a minute she didn’t touch her - what’s your view?
If she didn't touch the lady on the bike then it was the cyclist responsability to start on the cycle path.

As has been said she doesn't seem like a very nice woman but the sentence seems ridiculous to me and she will be released on appeal I would think.
 
if it wasn’t is it therefore ok to cause someone’s death.
A partially sighted woman riding somewhere she shouldn’t be would possibly be at fault - it’s not ok but I don’t think it’s a crime which is the crux of the debate.
 

The video of the actual incident (bar the car collision itself) is in that link.
There's nothing graphic in the clip.

I really don't know on this one, that's a very narrow path and I wouldn't have thought it was also a cycle lane from looking at it.

The woman jailed is clearly a horrible person, so I'm not sad for her, and I feel so sorry for that old woman, but it does look more like an unfortunate accident than anything to me.

Any decent person would clearly have just made room though, whatever the nature of the path.
She's clearly not a decent person given she's unapologetic about accidentally killing somebody and went shopping straight after it happened.
 
Last edited:
A partially sighted woman riding somewhere she shouldn’t be would possibly be at fault - it’s not ok but I don’t think it’s a crime which is the crux of the debate.
She probably shouldn't be riding a bike at all, I would have thought.
 
Back
Top