Search results

NZ needed 57 after Livingstone's over and they achieved that in three. We could have had another 15, even 20, and NZ probably would have won with the state of that bowling.

It might not, but isn't it a combined total loss of in excess of £39m over a rolling three-year period? Birmingham are within that unless their recent accounts show excessive losses.

"Why dont you go to the site and follow their sources, then you can make your own mind up - without "guessing"?" The point being that there are no sources. People have made their mind up. The salary info posted is crap.

The Labour party of 2019 is not the same as the one that exists right now, at least according to yourself given you think they're Tory-lite, so why would they not appeal more to the Lib Dems than the Tories, especially as they already got into that bed and are still suffering the reputation...

What with a party that wanted to put the nation through a 2nd referendum with a supposed "better" deal it was assured it would get from the EU?

I did look for myself and quite clearly salarysport is not a credible or reputable source of information. I get that people like yourself and Boromart believe what it claims because the information is agreeable rather than correct, but you will see that they have absolutely nothing to support...

Their widely contrasting stances on the EU and Brexit for a start. Lib Dems ultimately want to rejoin.

Probably end up with Robbie Savage.

Telling Cuthbert to go to the site and follow sources when there literally are no sources suggests to me you didn't even read through the site yourself before posting. If merely claiming "Sources - Press releases, news & articles, online encyclopedias & databases, industry experts & insiders. We...

Maybe he could if the website actually supported their data with sources. Other than to say they lift information from articles, databases, industry experts they find, there's nothing to follow, and as I found out in the summer when looking for info Barca's wage bill, their info is mostly incorrect.

If his goals get them back in the PL it'll be worth it and those wages will be covered in part by the parachute payment they're in receipt of.

Well it was reduced from £40m to about £31m last year from 2019. I don't think details are released until next month for recent finances and I would be surprised if it's anywhere near £31m this year.

It's mostly down to the player and staff promotion bonuses that get included in the accounts. The outgoings just end up ballooning, but then it's more than covered from the huge revenues made in the PL. Both Sheff Utd and Bournemouth turned a profit in their first PL season. Pretty sure we did...

Sure, zorro., if we ignore that Howe did five seasons with Bournemouth in the PL and Wilder couldn't overcome second season syndrome.

I wasn't disputing that claim, Abel.

Your claim in the opening post is simply incorrect, zorro.

Bournemouth's wage bill was £30.4m Sheff Utd's was £40.7m

b***ks they did. Sheff Utd's wage bill the season they were promoted was higher than Bournemouth's the season they were.

Few NE football journos on Twitter seem to think so. Mind, it's that Phil Spencer fella and the bloke from the Mail.

Looks like Roy's WC is over. Hamstring gone is it?