Search results

That’s not true Johnny they were in one hotel and they were moved to another hotel.

As understand it they were moved from one temporary accommodation to another temporary accommodation and that is the basis for the legal challenge. If you go in the gvt website it does say that you will unlikely be given housing in london or the south east. It was always therefore likely that...

So you really honestly believe that’s why they are being moved - as a political football.They are being moved because there is not enough accommodation where they were, plus the idea has always been to distribute across the country.

I have no opinion really - people are trying to turn this into a race issue , I’ve never once mentioned country of origin. I don’t care about that I just think we are trying to help people and they are turning on the people helping them and demanding more.

They had been in london one year hardly long enough to lay down roots , to move in between the first and the second year of their GCSEs is not ideal yet the gvt are trying to find them a permanent place to live. It hardly warrants taking them to court.

Thanks. It’s really nothing to do with politics or Tories, I’m much simpler than that. I just read that article and was angry that taxpayers money is being used to sue the very people who have offered them refuge including a roof over their head and education. It feels like a kick in the teeth...

https://publiclawproject.org.uk/current-projects-and-activities/legal-aid/

If it makes you happy calling me a racist crack on, it’s probably the easy option for you!

I did, did you? “The Afghan families' solicitor, Daniel Rourke, from the Public Law Project, said he was hopeful his clients would win the case and be allowed to return to south London”

Yes

Dunno but Johnny Vincent is very busy - he’s currently going through the backlog of any thread I’ve ever raised and adding a sad emoji to it. He could be sometime! Last seen adding an emoji to the cattermole thread - well if it makes him happy!

So it’s not affordable then - don’t you think that’s a bit of a blocker?

It’s funny isn’t it, you can mock all you want. There is a shortage of housing in the country , in london, you happy to pay private landlords just because someone proclaims they prefer london over say Middlesbrough.

You normally have the anti Tory/anti Boris stuff covered on a daily basis - I don’t want to step in your toes !!

They hardly had laid down roots in london they had barely been there. Many councils invoke that policy because they simply can’t afford to house people in london and the benefits amount will not cover the rent required to live in london. What’s the answer given there is no magic money tree for...

They are not in a vulnerable position - they have received refuge - they have a roof over their heads and are receiving education. Tonight I’ll go to my mates for dinner if his mum gives me a sandwich instead of steak I’ll tell her it’s not acceptable and demand steak! Let’s see how I get on!

Just a fallacy - we’ve spent x amount so there no harm spending more 🤷‍♀️

Again you have got nurses who can’t afford to live in london. Why when you are been given charity do you get to dictate what you must have.

Knowing about how much solicitors cost I’m upset at anyone abusing the system - that includes Johnson!

I’m not asking anybody for help though am I?