I'm sure it was Martha Reeves who said when asked if Diana Ross was the best female singer at Motown "she wasn't even the best receptionist"It was when she was exposed and singing alone it was really apparent. Whoever arranged the music made sure she was covered by the girl at the end in the four backing singers, just 3 singing harmonies and one girl singing in unison with her. The backing vocals were in there most of the time in every song Good job…it could have been worse. She wasn’t the best singer in the Supremes and wasn’t the lead singer in the beginning. She only got the lead vocal job because her and Berry Gordy, the Motown label owner, had a thing going. Well, so the story goes.
Saw Martha Reeves at the Cluny in Newcastle in 2016 best gig of the yearThis music is timeless.
Martha Reeves.
Thanks for linking that, I found it a bit sad to watch her yesterday but fair play to her for keeping going and enjoying it.This is one of her great performances.
[1964]
20 years old.
Black and white TV.
Mono recording.
Beehive hairstyles.
Directional Microphones.
Racial segregation still meant Diana and the Supremes were barred from performing at "white" venues - especially in the south.
So who's the best singer Paul or Diana? At least Paul looked as though he cared and was enjoying himself.
I also don't like the American Las Vegas style walk off in the middle of a song.
I'd love to see Dylan have another crack, he played in 1998 (and it was quite the setlist!)I don't know why they do this with performers who are long passed it.
Yeah, have a legend's slot and nothing against the older performers, but have someone who's still touring, relevant and at the very least still performing to somewhere near the level they were at their peak.
People will pretend they were great at Glasto, like they always do when the legends are poor (which isn't all the time), but I expect most would secretly be thinking they wish Glasto had just spent that money on someone good, from a more recent time.
All I can think is, the yonger folk would be thinking "WTF is this?", and the older folk thinking "she's nowhere near as good as she was".
Glasto is meant to be diverse, but shouldn't be compromising on quality, to get that diversification.
This is exactly it. It really doesn't matter if Miss Ross can no longer hit the notes, it's about the songs and the show. 45 minutes of crowd karaoke at Worthy Farm. I can pretty much guarantee that everyone in that field had an unforgettable time.I missed it, but presumably it was a good singalong - what a catalogue of songs she has - which is the main thing about the legends slot, isn't it?
I was there and he was utterly dreadfulI'd love to see Dylan have another crack, he played in 1998 (and it was quite the setlist!)
Bob Dylan Setlist at Glastonbury Festival 1998
Get the Bob Dylan Setlist of the concert at Worthy Farm, Pilton, England on June 28, 1998 from the Never Ending Tour and other Bob Dylan Setlists for free on setlist.fm!www.setlist.fm
If Tom Waits plays live again he'd be incredible too.
Yeah, it is one of the main things, or course it is, but it depends how good they are and how many people know them, otherwise it's like 18-30 year olds being practically forced to listen to a bad sing along on an OAP's cruise cabaret.I missed it, but presumably it was a good singalong - what a catalogue of songs she has - which is the main thing about the legends slot, isn't it?
I disagree voices and vocal ranges change with age look at how brilliant Leonard Cohen changed arrangements and sounded superb but if your cant sing in tune be it at pub karaoke or Glastonbury then it's a painful experience for anyone listening. She hurt my ears she was awfulThis is exactly it. It really doesn't matter if Miss Ross can no longer hit the notes, it's about the songs and the show. 45 minutes of crowd karaoke at Worthy Farm. I can pretty much guarantee that everyone in that field had an unforgettable time.
Those songs will live on long after we no longer have Diana, Paul or whoever to sing them. We will have tribute acts and people covering them for ever more. We had a show. I went to see Brian Wilson (formerly of The Beach Boys for those at the back) and his voice and general health are in a far worse place than Diana Ross or Macca. BUT the show and the songs were spellbinding and I stayed with it till the very end even though I had intended to wander off after ticking the "Brian Wilson" box. They did all the same things, backing singers singing the lead over the top of Brian, etc. But what songs and a great memorable show.
The sniffies are missing the point. Was it not ever thus?
Aw bless, have you found the TV remote yet? Thoughts and prayers.I disagree voices and vocal ranges change with age look at how brilliant Leonard Cohen changed arrangements and sounded superb but if your cant sing in tune be it at pub karaoke or Glastonbury then it's a painful experience for anyone listening. She hurt my ears she was awful
From what I saw of the crowd there were plenty of 18-30 year olds singing their hearts out. It's Glastonbury an alternative is but a few strides away. I avoided Dolly Parton in whatever year she was on the Legends Slot (which itself is a recent "thing") I saw the wonderful North Mississippi Allstars at a sparsely filled Avalon Stage. No one is "practically forced" to watch anyone.Yeah, it is one of the main things, or course it is, but it depends how good they are and how many people know them, otherwise it's like 18-30 year olds being practically forced to listen to a bad sing along on an OAP's cruise cabaret.