Angela Rayner sacked as Labour Party chair and national campaign co-ordinator

BlindBoyGrunt said:
As I said on another thread, it's time he did the honorable thing and stood down as former leader.
Click to expand...
I'm going to start my campaign to get Zarah Sultana elected leader ASAP. I've still got John McDonnell's phone number somewhere and if I can get him onboard then I have a chance of succeeding. Heart condition or no heart condition nobody messes with big John. And then I'll steer her career towards becoming the next prime minister. And then I'll marry her and have her babies.
 
She would learn a thing about Cayman if she went there. How regularity matters are governed by CIMA but hey I doubt you’d understand such matters!
 
Cayman is a British Overseas Territory and gets a financial contribution from the UK. There is a resident representative from the UK. Known as the Gosvenor.CIMA is the monetary authority responsible for governing all financial applications - be it Funds or captive insurance.

Do you honestly believe they would sh@@ on their doorstep? The Premier is held to account and is summoned to the UK over the course of a year and, if necessary, is hauled over the coals at the hint of any money mismanagement.
 
Last edited:
Rayner isnt a saint and said she was prepared to "suspend thousands" [of members] to achieve Starmers aims - but it goes to show: if you side up next to a snake, it will eventually bite you just the same. It is a huge warning to those who thought they had got into bed with the establishment`s man - only to find the Enemy Within.

Rayner isnt the first and wont be the last. I hope she continues to fight for her principles. (y)
 
Angela is a hard hitting MP and I am shocked at this decision. I am a party member but even I have seen that Labour have taken votes for granted in a lot of constituencies. Starmer can tear a new one into Johnson every week, it doesn't hurt the Tories. But he has not mentioned any policies. What can Labour offer?
The results weren't ALL bad -Labour did very well in Wales and comfortably held on to the West Country and Liverpool, despite the recent scandals. There again Liverpool was a given anyway because nobody would vote for a Tory there- even the Sun is banned. Preston city is interesting because Labour keep the money local, not privatising services and even forming 12 co-operatives so that employees have a vested interest in the organisations. So Labour were returned with a good majority. Small comfort but at least it is something to hang on to.
But I am digressing, Unless Starmer can offer policies he should go.
My choice would be John McDonnel- he is vocal, straightforward, outspoken, clear in his beliefs, a very good debator and uses facts to back up what he says.
 
Trug said:
Angela is a hard hitting MP and I am shocked at this decision. I am a party member but even I have seen that Labour have taken votes for granted in a lot of constituencies. Starmer can tear a new one into Johnson every week, it doesn't hurt the Tories. But he has not mentioned any policies. What can Labour offer?
The results weren't ALL bad -Labour did very well in Wales and comfortably held on to the West Country and Liverpool, despite the recent scandals. There again Liverpool was a given anyway because nobody would vote for a Tory there- even the Sun is banned. Preston city is interesting because Labour keep the money local, not privatising services and even forming 12 co-operatives so that employees have a vested interest in the organisations. So Labour were returned with a good majority. Small comfort but at least it is something to hang on to.
But I am digressing, Unless Starmer can offer policies he should go.
My choice would be John McDonnel- he is vocal, straightforward, outspoken, clear in his beliefs, a very good debator and uses facts to back up what he says.
Click to expand...
And a bigger liability than Starmer. That would sink the Labour Party to further depths.
 
I still don't get the massive u turn within the membership to vote for an obvious fraud like Starmer after they'd unanimously voted for Corbyn. RLB was who I voted for and it just seems really weird to me that so many people decided to ditch their left wing principles and vote for the right wing turd instead.
 
r00fie1 said:
Rayner isnt a saint and said she was prepared to "suspend thousands" [of members] to achieve Starmers aims - but it goes to show: if you side up next to a snake, it will eventually bite you just the same. It is a huge warning to those who thought they had got into bed with the establishment`s man - only to find the Enemy Within.

Rayner isnt the first and wont be the last. I hope she continues to fight for her principles. (y)
Click to expand...
Genuine question.
Do you want those who support Starmer/Blair etc to leave the party? And do you think they would want the Corbyn /McDonnell side to?
IE Are the 2 sides compatible in the same party?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top