They should have had the points deduction last season, and it should have been more than 2 points.It does make a mockery of last season with the fact that they were willing to retain players like Berge who directly helped them get promoted all the while they were defaulting on payments.
what are the odds on Gibson looking at legal action again?It does make a mockery of last season with the fact that they were willing to retain players like Berge who directly helped them get promoted all the while they were defaulting on payments.
Plus they’ve pocketed the proceeds from a season in the premier league.It does make a mockery of last season with the fact that they were willing to retain players like Berge who directly helped them get promoted all the while they were defaulting on payments.
Absolutely. The retrospective punishments when teams gain promotion and are then subsequently relegated are meaningless.It does make a mockery of last season with the fact that they were willing to retain players like Berge who directly helped them get promoted all the while they were defaulting on payments.
I might be wrong on this as memory is a bit hazy, but I'm sure they were under an embargo for none payment, whilst continuing to play the players they hadn't paid for, refusing to sell those that they could have, all because they didn't want to weaken the team??? I'm sure one of them was Brewster? and think there was issues with Anel Ahmedhodzic's too!
Absolutely stinks.
Well I think from MemoryTotally agree, a transfer embargo between Feb and end of June, what is the point. Should be for the next transfer window, also any player they default on is illegible until it is paid followed by a points deduction. Who knows how they would have faired in games without those they defaulted on
If you are going to have rules then need to stick with them and have a punishment with teeth. Also this was an easy one to punish in the season the offence took place.
FFP is harder due to accounting years etc..