I suppose uni admissions were always based on this, conditionally. But now you just don't have to fulfil the conditions. I was accepted onto a course with requirements of my predicted BBB, I got CCD and then found it way too hard. So I can well imagine there being some repercussions of this.There is something seriously wrong about a student getting a grade based on if the teacher liked you or not. So how can they quantify this.
But you’ve seen students today with As across the board yet the margins between A and B is so marginal especially under exam conditions that to award them across the board is very curious.I suppose uni admissions were always based on this, conditionally. But now you just don't have to fulfil the conditions. I was accepted onto a course with requirements of my predicted BBB, I got CCD and then found it way too hard. So I can well imagine there being some repercussions of this.
There isn't that much coursework anymoreThe predicted grades were based on course work.
Not perfect but I can't think of another way.
I hear your points and they are valid but when it’s revesled on review 103,000 grades were re evaluated shows that maybe it’s not as flawless and fair as made out.
An Entry exams test for uni is the only fair test surely.
There is something seriously wrong about a student getting a grade based on if the teacher liked you or not. So how can they quantify this.
Loads of kids perform poorly in mocks then 'ace' the real thing - it's a shambles like normal
Mock exams are set by the pupils' teachers. They can make sure the kids are prepared. The final exams are set by exam boards so the teachers have less control.Loads of kids perform poorly in mocks then 'ace' the real thing - it's a shambles like normal
But they didn't know the mocks would be critical at the time so why would they have 'made sure the kids were prepared' ?Mock exams are set by the pupils' teachers. They can make sure the kids are prepared. The final exams are set by exam boards so the teachers have less control.
Mock exams are set by the pupils' teachers. They can make sure the kids are prepared. The final exams are set by exam boards so the teachers have less control.
Agreed, nothing else they could do given the time scales IMOThere is no perfect system.
Exactly there’s a reason teachers don’t grade their own exams.Using mock results means students that did badly but improved are not rewarded. Exams are marked confidentially so there is no bias but teacher marked exams will contain bias. Teachers know their students, or at least think they do. They will mark more favourably for students that they think are good than for students they don't like or think are bad. I have no evidence but I know that is how people act when interviewing so it seems like a reasonable assumption.
I don't know what a better solution is but it is hard to keep biases and interpretations out of these sort of things. It's not necessarily intentional. I know I had teachers who were surprised at some of my exam results because I didn't really put any effort in during class.