Recent content by Rofesleg

Your Asda is poorly run. The on offer wines are normally on the easily accessible shelves. The top shelves are for the higher priced bottles. If you check the Ben & Jerry's ice cream section in the freezer I bet it is a nightmare. A sure sign of a lackadaisical team.

The difference being that quote was in black and white for people to read again. It wasn't a case of misinterpreting, it was misquoting.

Ripley was superb. I'm surprised he didn't win more trophies and England caps.

I was disappointed we sold Reach, he was a decent squad member. But he has pretty much played at the level I expected him to, The Championship.

I'm not sure what moral high ground you think you are taking here. naively_optimistic claims to have got the information directly from both a contract expert and from a person involved in the transfer of a top player. Not from information 'out there' that he has misinterpreted. People have given...

Except naivelyoptimistic specifically said that the sell-on clause is voided because the new longer contract means the club can demand a higher transfer fee.

10+5+4 =19

I thought there was only two of them?

He was also a regular in a Celtic side that had just won 8 consecutive titles. During a period in which Scottish football was decent. It was a great signing and we knew it. Not comparable to Ings at all. If anything from that era it is more like signing Micky Burns, and that didn't turn out too bad.

I don't think he did. He had 4 on the pitch at the same time on three separate occasions in Europe. Which, as it turned out, was once too often. - Yakubu - Viduka - JFH - Massimo

😀😀 Maybe not. But you could have kept your powder dry and wished him happy anniversary in 4 weeks time. He might have forgotten about this thread and spent literally minutes wondering how you knew.

Most of them will probably be on display in the Rangers end.

I did read it. You asked northernrower if he wants to starve migrants. Unnecessary - with or without a question mark.

But don't you think the tone of his reply was deliberately provocative? His point was valid as a consequence of stopping the benefits package. But to imply that was the intention of the OP seems unnecessary.