Cheers. The guy can't help himself. I've asked him to tone down the personal vitriol but he wouldn't recognise an olive branch if he was staring at one. Fortunately the vast majority of the board can listen to an alternative view without resorting to unfounded smears
Thanks, I think. I have absolutely no motivations but prefer to see litigation run it's course and then form a view. Agree with you about the cost cap but thought there was a decision due on that soon.
I have never and will never defend corruption of any kind. If I have missed something that proves corruption then I apologise but the NAO report that I have read in full makes it clear that Ministers acted appropriately by declaring possible conflicts, not being involved in awarding contracts or...
Thanks for the support Cooper. ST really cannot deal with someone having a contrary view to him. He fires off nonsense without engaging brain. Just thinking would hate to see him on a jury as his ignorance of the rules of evidence is frightening. Never mind beyond reasonable doubt or balance...
He really does talk utter rubbish on many topics particularly Brexit, Vaccines and now this. I am a bit old fashioned in that I like to consider the evidence myself rather than joining the herd. I have not yet seen any evidence of corruption in either the JR decision from last week or the NAO...
We are told that the GLP are bringing some more cases to court so I prefer awaiting those and having them tested in court not on this board which is hardly balanced
I was referring to the findings of the recently published JR judgment. I will await reading the future judgments rather than unsubstantiated allegations on this message board.
Think most fair minded people not driven by political bias would agree. The sourcing and procurement of PPE et al trumped nondescript transparency regs.