Recent content by ChingBoro

I think it is more for the start so the host has someone to bounce off. Just watched a bit of the Irish one and no one gets kicked out for a while so it is just Graham Norton on his own for a while which is a bit strange

I don't understand how we have a squad without any midfielders we can bring on to help close a game out. Regardless of your thoughts on Barlaser he is not that type of player. Last night when 1 up we should be taking one of the forwards off and bringing on a defensive midfielders to shore things...

Its a difficult one this, mainly because seem to be very much a confidence team. Last season around this time we were on a awful run to the extent that we were starting to look over our shoulder at the bottom 3. We got a lucky sending off against Norwich when we were 1 down and managed to turn...

Also, I presume that Carrick has ultimate say over his coaching staff so if they are not doing what he wants then it is up to him to change that, just like it is responsibility to ensure that the players carry out his instructions. So they must be doing what he is asking them to do or he would...

You could argue that he tried to do that by bringing Barlaser on for Azaz but that clearly didn't make much difference although the issue was further back with Giles bombing forward all the time. The correct move would have probably been to bring Fry on, go 5 at the back which would allow Giles...

Is he not injured anyway?

The problem with saying we should have just cleared it away is you are basically saying that we should just aimlessly boot the ball away every time the ball comes to one of our players in the penalty area. If Ayling/Rav didn't have their heads down due to their head clash then there wouldn't...

But I mean if you call out the Traitor correctly you can take the whole pot. As things stand a Faithful can only win half the money at best.

You could also have something similar with the final 2. They have to state whether they think the other person is a Faithful or a Traitor. If you get it wrong you lose the money and other person takes it all. Currently there is no way for a Faithful to win all the money. Therefore if there are...

If it happens again (which I doubt) I think everyone will actively avoid being The Seer. Although maybe the problem was that she picked the only traitor otherwise you would have definitely had Charlotte in the end game and that would have spiced it all up. Also, I don't think they should...

I think Francesca should have said that Charlotte was a faithful, then they would have probably all turned on Alexander and got him out. After that she could have started spreading the notion that she is lying and Charlotte is actually traitor and hoped that people follow her lead in the end...

He also confirmed that Glover is ahead of him on merit at the moment, Dieng is fully fit.

I've been thinking about that Anna girl who was an attempted recruit. It took a day or two but she eventually revealed to everyone that she was recruited but rejected it. Following this everyone has seemingly 100% presumed she is a faithful. I wonder if Charlotte became a traitor and then...

Have any of them considered that this could have actually happened? I know it didn't but IF Leon was a traitor and lost the game, surely it would have just meant that Fozia was murdered and Leon would have just gone back in the house and said he won the game and no one apart from Fozia (who is...

Maybe he lives in Whitby or something but he definitely has a Scottish accent.....and pink hair