FatCat
Well-known member
Just watched this on Netflix - First World War from the Germans perspective. Interesting film!
All Quiet on the Western Front https://g.co/kgs/5og4uf
All Quiet on the Western Front https://g.co/kgs/5og4uf
That’s a nice sentiment, but what about the folk who volunteered?A great watch. Even more so with the boy. War is horrible, not glamorous, appalling.
As said before, the lengths humans can go to submit other humans to suffering never fails to appall me. I’ve never had to go to war, pray that my boy doesn’t. That’s why I wear the poppy to pay thanks to those who didn’t have a choice
RespectThat’s a nice sentiment, but what about the folk who volunteered?
I thought 1917 was very poor with ridiculous holes in the storyNot an easy watch, but neither should it be. I thought 1917 was better in many ways, but worth watching for sure.
Watching that film just reinforces my view of some of the remeberence displays being a bit crass, one I saw had silhouettes of bombers dropping bombs , spitfires and rifles.
When did we start glorifying war?
I think the book by Kramer was excellent, and upsetting. It's hard to represent things like this on film.I thought 1917 was very poor with ridiculous holes in the story
I’m watching it now and I’m going to turn it off as it’s nothing more than German propaganda and it’s part of this altering of history under going in the media within Germany to how they can look at their own history in a more neutral forgiving light.
The French are the bad guys here and we don’t get a mention.
Very very suspicious motives behind this
The book is a masterpiece on the horror of the Great War this wasn’t that it didn’t even reflect the book.The novel was written by a WWI German war veteran based on his experiences (and trauma) of the trenches. He was only in trenches facing the French. So, to add the British to a film based on his book, would be rewriting history.
The book was written in 1929, the original film (a Hollywood 1930 production) and this are not so much asking for forgiveness, but reasonably portraying the message from the novel - trench warfare was hell for all concerned.
Of course, 39 to 45 puts a completely different frame on Germany and WWI.
On the 'us' issue. Didn't we just have a great WWI film, 1917, with no reference at all, that I can recall, about the French involvement in the war that year?
I thought 1917 was great. But it always bugged me a bit that he turned up with the letter and it was bone dry. Is that possible? Did they have special super waterproof tins in the military even back then?I thought 1917 was very poor with ridiculous holes in the story
The book is a masterpiece on the horror of the Great War this wasn’t that it didn’t even reflect the book.
You need to worry more about the way in which British history is taught rather than German which absolutely does not shy away from the horrors of the Holocaust and the sins of their predecessors.I’m watching it now and I’m going to turn it off as it’s nothing more than German propaganda and it’s part of this altering of history under going in the media within Germany to how they can look at their own history in a more neutral forgiving light.
Totally agree, as that is a masterpiece! Its worth watching the forgotten voices, as that gives a true account from the people that were there. I don't know how that generation survived after the great war, given what we have seen from more recent conflicts. A visit to the battlefields of Flanders really brings it home, and every time I visit it makes me reflect just that little bit more.The Film by Peter Jackson They Shall Not Grow Old was the most poignant work to remind the younger generations how bad WW1 was. The portrayal of excited lads running down to the recruitment office in their naive expectancy that they will see of “the Bosch “ in days and return home heroes. The reality couldn’t have been more grim.