My post was a reply towards UTB70 post on why he’s got a lifetime ban. A normal FBO for entering the field of play is 3 years. So he’s got a lifetime ban for his reaction towards the stewards and rightly so.
Club Statement on Pitch Invaders
- Thread starter fmttmadmin
- Start date
My post was a reply towards UTB70 post on why he’s got a lifetime ban. A normal FBO for entering the field of play is 3 years. So he’s got a lifetime ban for his reaction towards the stewards and rightly so.
coluka
Well-known member
Of course things across the season contribute, but those things are down to the team and club itself, not so called Boro supporters.
As for giving the kid a break, the club has or has that passed you by, he isn’t banned as far as I can see. I think he should be though, at least till he is old enough to act responsibly. Wilder and the club have every right to be furious. Anyone defending the kid’s incursion, a criminal act, is an idiot.
Stocko
Well-known member
Yes, the Boro have not been good enough, majority of Boro fans will be gutted to lose out on the play offs because of a needless goal scored by Stoke, caused by a ”fan”
Midnight to Six Man
Well-known member
Get in there , nice one Boro , same should happen to the doyle who let his kid put a sign up asking for Harry Kane's shirt after the Spurs game .
I just cant get my head around how any rational father/responsible guardian would encourage a child to run onto the pitch so that he can record it.
Surely this isnt a fan, more just some attention seeking n0bhead who cares more about what he posts on facebook than the boro. Is this just indicative of the selfishness and self-importance a lot of people seem to have nowadays?
I genuinely cant see how this makes sense to anybody.
I lot of us vividly remember being penned in like animals at all football grounds and the reasons why this was done away with. The fences were removed for fan safety not so some chav can send his kids onto the pitch for a laugh.
Banned for life is totally appropriate
Surely this isnt a fan, more just some attention seeking n0bhead who cares more about what he posts on facebook than the boro. Is this just indicative of the selfishness and self-importance a lot of people seem to have nowadays?
I genuinely cant see how this makes sense to anybody.
I lot of us vividly remember being penned in like animals at all football grounds and the reasons why this was done away with. The fences were removed for fan safety not so some chav can send his kids onto the pitch for a laugh.
Banned for life is totally appropriate
the_holgate_roof
Well-known member
Yes and finally the stupid kid who ran on, might be the final nail, please don’t appear to be an apologist for this kid and his fool of a father.
Lemmy_kilmister
Well-known member
Made the Nationals
www.theguardian.com
Middlesbrough issue life ban to fan following son’s Riverside pitch invasion
A father who allowed his child to run on the pitch at Middlesbrough during the Championship match with Stoke has been banned from the Riverside for life
www.theguardian.com
TheYorkshireTerrier
Well-known member
Good decision by the club, pity it took the last game of the season to do it though.
chickenrunner
Well-known member
Not for running on the pitch but for wanting a selfie with Rooney.
Gudintheair
Active member
Well done MFC......one less brain dead moron in the ground. Anyone else who let their children onto the pitch should also receive a significant ban.
wilkos_perm
Well-known member
Those things happen, it's football. People on the pitch is not part of a game, it's completely different and unnecessary
Alzi
Well-known member
Good.
Same_as_before
Well-known member
I am not an apologist, but let's get it into perceptive, banning a child for life that's way over the top. His dad's a Berk, so he gets what he deserves.
I can remember going to a game that was stopped all the time for fans sat beside the pitch. At the end over 10,000,fancy banning that lot for life.