The lad'll be lucky to see a penny, Laxley or whatever his name is this week will just declare himself bankrupt and live off his supporters.Poor Stephen, that'll be £100k to the young lad who you libelled, quick as you can please.
BBC Story
The lad'll be lucky to see a penny, Laxley or whatever his name is this week will just declare himself bankrupt and live off his supporters.
you're right, already has because of this caseThink he already has, isn't his massive house in rural Bedfodshire in his wife's name ?
Or do they?Ultimately liars get their comeuppance. It’s why I still have hope that this government gets what is coming to it.
Yaxley-Lennon is a despicable human being and deserves everything he continues to get.
It will be interesting to see if he gets away with such a blatant attempt to avoid paying his "consequences". I imagine this isn't going to be the last time he has to "defend himself" in a court of law.Think he already has, isn't his massive house in rural Bedfodshire in his wife's name ?
I can’t decide which of these the Yax is. Possibly all threerepresenting yourself is one of the real indicators.
It means you are either
a) mental
b) a person who thinks they are intelligent but is actually too stupid to realise they are stupid.
c) so much of an **** even a defence firm won't take you on.
Yaxley-Lennon is the very worst of this country, a serial law breaking bully, who only got involved in politics when his drug round in Luton was taxed by Asian’s driven from London by the Albanian Mafia.
How a wife beating, drug dealing, police man assaulting, fraud committing football hooligan has any place as a spokesperson for any political entity is baffling, I do suppose as someone who attempted illegal entry into a country on a false passport he has some inside knowledge on immigration and his stand against peadophiles seems noble until one learns that he gave fake alibis to help aide the case of a friend’ who in spite of Robinson’s statements was convicted on several counts of peadophila.
interesting case this one. there seemed to be a fair few testifying that the kid in the case was indeed a bully, hitting a girl with a hockey stick and smashing another kids head off the wall etc. some adults talking about it too. there was a video of locals being questioned about it, not just the stereotype Robinson supporters, but even some Asian elders saying the kid was a bully and attacked younger kids. so I guess the decision just dismisses any witnesses on those things. I wonder how much it was even considered
That’s not to defend Tommy Robinson, he had no place to get involved, although I’m sure I know why he did.
I still think there was more to the case and he may not have been totally wrong about the story, unless we’re just dismissing a fair few and kids locals as total liars, but it certainly wasn’t his place to be involved anyway.
whether he’s right or wrong about what happened, I don’t think it’s wrong to be paying damages for blowing up a story involving children, but then again, so did the newspapers...but they’re hardly a moral compass either.