Meghan and Harry

sherlock1969 said:
Did you really finish one post by saying 'you lack both compassion and objectiveness' and start the very next post with 'They're parasites'?
Click to expand...
I have sympathy for them being born into that family and being in a goldfish bowl. But continuing in it and continuing the big lie is their choice, which objectively makes them parasites. Thanks for your input
 
Jimstewart said:
As I’ve said I’m no fan of them but just curious to know where the jealous racist bully bit comes from? I get the privilege and white bits coz she’s deffo loaded and white.
Click to expand...
I'm still waiting for the answer to that myself.
Spoiler, he doesn't have one.
Plus you can't say Markle is black and privileged as you'll be accused of racism.

I'm also curious as to why Miss Markle insinuated that the royal family cost her to lose her father.
 
BoroMart said:
I have sympathy for them being born into that family and being in a goldfish bowl. But continuing in it and continuing the big lie is their choice, which objectively makes them parasites. Thanks for your input
Click to expand...
Nice objectivity there.....completely flawed of course but seeing as you are completely set in your ignorant views there's little point trying to educate you.
 
Randy said:
I'm still waiting for the answer to that myself.
Spoiler, he doesn't have one.
Plus you can't say Markle is black and privileged as you'll be accused of racism.

I'm also curious as to why Miss Markle insinuated that the royal family cost her to lose her father.
Click to expand...
My answer is that the BBC are doing a PR job to make it team Kate vs team Meghan. They are portraying that anything from the Harry/Meghan side cannot be true because look what a lovely caring helpful person Kate is, thus trying to undermine any assertions in her direction. There clearly has been some beef between the two, and the specifics are not clear, but whatever Kate's side is she is being protected, because you know her husband will be King....unless we can get the whole lot booted out Bolshevik style
 
sherlock1969 said:
Nice objectivity there.....completely flawed of course but seeing as you are completely set in your ignorant views there's little point trying to educate you.
Click to expand...
In what way am I flawed or ignorant.....show me your wisdom oh cap doffing one :ROFLMAO: and please, please, please do not come back and tell me they are not parasites because they bring more into our tourism than they take out in costs :ROFLMAO: just do not go there.
 
Zoophonic said:
Incredible and most say they don’t care about
Click to expand...
BoroMart said:
My answer is that the BBC are doing a PR job to make it team Kate vs team Meghan. They are portraying that anything from the Harry/Meghan side cannot be true because look what a lovely caring helpful person Kate is, thus trying to undermine any assertions in her direction. There clearly has been some beef between the two, and the specifics are not clear, but whatever Kate's side is she is being protected, because you know her husband will be King....unless we can get the whole lot booted out Bolshevik style
Click to expand...
But clear beef between two women doesn’t have to equate to racism and bullying does it?
 
Jimstewart said:
But clear beef between two women doesn’t have to equate to racism and bullying does it?
Click to expand...
there's been some racism, be it from Kate or William, Charles or Camilla. Anyone outside of that wouldn't be 'damaging enough'. We know it isn't the Queen or Prince Phillip. Seeing the BBC promoting Kate several times today might be coincident, and then again it might not.

But that wasn't really my point, my point was that the BBC are now promoting Kate as some caring, sharing person the day after this bombshell. It's PR.
 
BoroMart said:
there's been some racism, be it from Kate or William, Charles or Camilla. Anyone outside of that wouldn't be 'damaging enough'. We know it isn't the Queen or Prince Phillip. Seeing the BBC promoting Kate several times today might be coincident, and then again it might not.
Click to expand...
How do we know there has been racism?
 
BoroMart said:
My answer is that the BBC are doing a PR job to make it team Kate vs team Meghan. They are portraying that anything from the Harry/Meghan side cannot be true because look what a lovely caring helpful person Kate is, thus trying to undermine any assertions in her direction. There clearly has been some beef between the two, and the specifics are not clear, but whatever Kate's side is she is being protected, because you know her husband will be King....unless we can get the whole lot booted out Bolshevik style
Click to expand...
I don't watch the BBC so wouldn't know. Cancelled my TV license recently.

So your saying because Kate and Meghan fell out (probably over the colour of curtains or some rich b***ks that rich people fall out over) then it's racist because Meghan is mixed race?
Crikey.
 
BoroMart said:
So you are refusing to believe the claims of racism? Despite two people stating it happened including the victim?

Do you claim bullied children aren't bullied, do you claim rape victims are crying wolf? Or this a specific thing you are saving for Merkle?
Click to expand...
She is claiming racism but not acknowledging who, why not name and shame?
 
BoroMart said:
there's been some racism, be it from Kate or William, Charles or Camilla. Anyone outside of that wouldn't be 'damaging enough'. We know it isn't the Queen or Prince Phillip. Seeing the BBC promoting Kate several times today might be coincident, and then again it might not.

But that wasn't really my point, my point was that the BBC are now promoting Kate as some caring, sharing person the day after this bombshell. It's PR.
Click to expand...
I’d be surprised if one of the younger members of the firm were racist towards her. I can imagine either of Jug ears feckwit brothers or even his mrs but I’d be surprised if anyone of the younger generation brought skin colour into it. Sometimes women just don’t like women you know.
 
BoroMart said:
Prince William:
06 : spent at Royal Military Academy (Household Cavalry)
07 : 4 month 'mission' in Devon commanding an armoured reconnaissance vehicle. He played about in a small armoured truck. He allegedly wanted active service, but was denied. We all know this was PR.
07 : left the army after wasting a training place and driving around a carpark in Devon avoiding pastie bombs and angry natives that wanted their jam and cream the right way around. He joined the Navy. Commissioned as a lieutenant but saw no service, and I don't think he even went to sea.
08 : He joined the RAF and earned his wings, he flew one mission in Afghanistan... to repatriate a dead soldier. I.e. land a helicopter, pick up a poor fallen comrade, fly back to base. Done, now he can go home and claim he has had active service. Not one shot fired anywhere near his vicinity. It was a 'safe' mission, with troops already securing the area he flew to. He spent two months on his first duty, and a further 4 months in his second. But was bound to base.
10 : Did his helicopter training license in Anglesey
11 : He completed a 6 week 'tour' of the Falklands, watch those penguins they're vicious.
Total of 7 1/2 years in the armed forces, about about 2 1/2 in each, a career officer doesn't jump around like that, it was largely PR.

Prince Harry :
10 years in the marines and Air Corp
2 1/2 tours, first one ended early due to media
was involved in multiple missions, including gunfights with Taliban and killed several as the gunner on an Apache. Unlike his brother he was in dangerous situations on multiple occasions.
Then dedicated effort to help setup Invictus Games for wounded troops.

Not calling William a coward, I understand why he was kept away from the front line. But for William the army was PR, making sure he was never near the front line and had a spell in Army, Navy and RAF just so that he could have something in common when he is head of the armed forces, with no favourites. For Harry it was a career. So yes, his career was far more a proper soldier.

It was the same with the previous generation. Prince Charles pretended to be an RAF commander for 5 years, while the pedo actually flew in a combat zone, because you know, he was the spare, not the heir. Edward, spent 3 years studying paid by the marines, then dropped out of the marines 4 months into training, to go prance around in tights for Andrew Lloyd Weber. More public money wasted on trying to make Edward look like he cared about the armed forces.
Click to expand...
William wasn’t allowed in a combat zone being 2nd in line to the throne.
 
Randy said:
I don't watch the BBC so wouldn't know. Cancelled my TV license recently.

So your saying because Kate and Meghan fell out (probably over the colour of curtains or some rich b***ks that rich people fall out over) then it's racist because Meghan is mixed race?
Crikey.
Click to expand...
no that's not what I'm saying. I'm saying playing Meghan off against William would be seen as bullying, playing Harry off against anyone isn't going to go down well. Playing Kate off against Meghan is a tactic that they will have decided. Expect to see lots and lots of Kate, and what a great person she is, regardless if she is.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top