I haven't changed my tune. I just copied and pasted what I'd already statedGlad you changed the tune. It's still utter, utter rubbish though.
It's not really up for debate. The evidence is there to say that some of the more reasonably priced brands are indeed better quality. By better quality I mean they work as they should without breaking or needing to be fixed regularly. I see where some people might perceive quality in a different way, i.e. leather seating or the interior, etc. But the quality of a car has to be linked to its functionality and how well it works for its intended purpose.That’s rubbish - most wouldn’t agree.
Cheaper brands might be better value but certainly not better quality
It surely IS up for debate. You have asserted that most people think some cheaper cars are better then premium cars. Not ONE person has agreed with this assertion so far. It honestly sounds ridiculous what you are saying.I haven't changed my tune. I just copied and pasted what I'd already stated
It's not really up for debate. The evidence is there to say that some of the more reasonably priced brands are indeed better quality. By better quality I mean they work as they should without breaking or needing to be fixed regularly. I see where some people might perceive quality in a different way, i.e. leather seating or the interior, etc. But the quality of a car has to be linked to its functionality and how well it works for its intended purpose.
I've owned 2.land rovers, again no issues but I would agree my Toyota is amazing in terms of reliability but no where near as nice to drive.It seems to be the OP, and general opinion has moved from "Premium Cars are worse quality than cheaper cars" To "Land rover cars are worse quality than Toyota cars"
Which is good, because unlike the original post, the second thing actually makes sense.
What is a Rolex inferior too?
Sorry mate it really does sound like you are trying to drive down the importance of making a quality product because you want them and can't afford them. Your original post sounded like that and you're working hard to cement this idea.
Last time I compared equipment levels in a Toyota against an Audi there was more tech in the Toyota as standard and fully loaded there was very little difference. Climate, touch screen, head up, leccy windows, seats and mirrors, pan roof, etc. I would struggle to think of a toy that isn't available on a Toyota c.f. an Audi. Difference was that the Toyota stuff would be less likely to go wrong. Same with Mercs and Beemers, same toys just more expensive and less reliable.Sounds like someones jealous of people who can afford premium brands! It's always a skewed thing because premium cars simply have more things on them to go wrong.
Sounds proofing too. Nicer cars have better sound proofingLast time I compared equipment levels in a Toyota against an Audi there was more tech in the Toyota as standard and fully loaded there was very little difference. Climate, touch screen, head up, leccy windows, seats and mirrors, pan roof, etc. I would struggle to think of a toy that isn't available on a Toyota c.f. an Audi. Difference was that the Toyota stuff would be less likely to go wrong. Same with Mercs and Beemers, same toys just more expensive and less reliable.
The price differential is not the tech it is generally materials. Nicer leather, better plastics etc. the cabin is a nicer place to be.
Sounds like someone bought a nice car and is astonished that braggadocio isn't cool...
Everyone knows that the OP is a discerning individual who probably wears a Patek Philippe or a A. Lange & Söhne, to go with his Margaret Howell clothes and fit nicely with his vintage Porsche that he drives home to meet his Dr friend.
Rolex, BMW's and Prada are beneath him, for those less cultured sorts, the type of person who buys a Peloton no doubt.
Rolex are a basic common watch which is mass produced. People buy them because of the brand - not because of the actual watches. I have two watches, a Grand Seiko which I picked up from a second hand store and a Journe which I was given. The GS is quite sporty and the Journe a bit more dressy but I wear it as a casual piece as it has a blue dial.What is a Rolex inferior too?
They aren't though
Rolex are a basic common watch which is mass produced. People buy them because of the brand - not because of the actual watches. I have two watches, a Grand Seiko which I picked up from a second hand store and a Journe which I was given. The GS is quite sporty and the Journe a bit more dressy but I wear it as a casual piece as it has a blue dial.
Oh, you didn't read the but where i admitted the quality on my new car was lacking. Something I know beforehand. Also something I knew I'd noticed because my last 3 cars have all been from the big German manufacturers and whether people who don't own them want to deny it or not, you can definitely feel the difference between a premium brand and a run of the mill vehicle. Still if the OP is happy to think they are worse because he drives an insignia or whatever then fair play to him. He's happy. Doesn't make him correct thoughLast time I compared equipment levels in a Toyota against an Audi there was more tech in the Toyota as standard and fully loaded there was very little difference. Climate, touch screen, head up, leccy windows, seats and mirrors, pan roof, etc. I would struggle to think of a toy that isn't available on a Toyota c.f. an Audi. Difference was that the Toyota stuff would be less likely to go wrong. Same with Mercs and Beemers, same toys just more expensive and less reliable.
The price differential is not the tech it is generally materials. Nicer leather, better plastics etc. the cabin is a nicer place to be.
Sounds like someone bought a nice car and is astonished that braggadocio isn't cool...
I'm a Richard Mille man myself but, to each their own!Everyone knows that the OP is a discerning individual who probably wears a Patek Philippe or a A. Lange & Söhne, to go with his Margaret Howell clothes and fit nicely with his vintage Porsche that he drives home to meet his Dr friend.
Rolex, BMW's and Prada are beneath him, for those less cultured sorts, the type of person who buys a Peloton no doubt.
I'm a Richard Mille man myself but, to each their own!
I actually like them. Probably due to their connection with motorsports and Le Mans. Yeah, they are not subtle though, I have a Baume and Mercier for that!Richard Mille are by and large hideous, designed pretty much with the sole intention of rappers and sports stars to show how much money they have.
Just, once again , I personally have owned 2 and they were okay.Hot off the press.
Expensive Land Rovers and Teslas are most UNRELIABLE cars
https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money...ers-Teslas-UNRELIABLE-cars-says-watchdog.html