Good question.
We don't need a mayor of Middlesbrough.
Question should have been is, why do we have a mayor of Middlesbrough.
The constitution allows a residents referendum, which must be held a minimum of 10 years apart to change the make up of the council
10 years ago, Ray Mallon (remember him) said we should have a referendum on whether we should have a mayor or just a council leader.
The Labour group campaigned heavily, we did market stalls and paid for a leaflet to all houses in the town to abolish the mayors position.
A chap named Andrew Preston campaigned to keep the position of elected Mayor and stated he wasn't interested in the post personally, but believed that someone should be responsible for what the council did.
He won, and put up for every election since, losing the first one to Dave Budd.
He won the next and the rest is history, but even as mayor, he has never accepted responsibility for what the council does, even tonight after 4 years he chose to be a shithead and blamed council officers for the mess he has got the council in.
The 10 year rule ends this autumn.
I shall be campaigning to abolish the position of elected mayor this autumn and demand we have a referendum on that question!
I shall do so and say that now, before the election of the new mayor this May. We have a great chance of winning and ending with a Labour Mayor, regardless I will be campaigning to remove that position because as proved; absolute power corrupts ....