Search results

I guess how you consider them isn’t the relevant part, it’s scientific studies into it that matter really. If ashp are returning 2 or 3 times the energy they consume then over the lifetime of course it will be greener, as long as you change how you use it. PV and batteries have saved me a fair...

I think we are better than both, the only reason they finished above was our massive injury crisis and throwing away the first 5 games by not having a cf or lb at the club Norwich will have to sell one of their three best players as they’re without parachute payments now and losing lots of...

Don’t they actually weigh behind the scenes a few hours earlier and this is actually all for show. The weight they call out being what they weighed earlier?

Doesn’t that really depend on the insulation quality of your home as much as anything and if it’s well insulated great. I have solar, so running an ashp from That could Make it cheap certainly in spring and autumn

cool, I've fallen into the same 4 bed new(-ish) build middle class nightmare too, so should be a great comparison for me (y) I'm in the process of getting builders for a 2 room extension, so it's the perfect time for me to consider a new heating solution. Kent based, so ambient temps are a...

Can you give some updates over the next few weeks. Is your house a new build? Size? Etc I’m considering it myself

Not sure worst, dull football but it was effective more than not

Sara is very talented and Sargent is a good goalscorer at this level, Rowe is a talent. But how many will they need to sell to balance the books and how many will be poached. I think they’ll lose two of those but maybe only have about 10m to spend. I think their wages are pretty high after a...

I hate Leeds BUT they’ll be a massive force next year with parachute payments. Norwich are a two man team and they’ll lose at least one of them if they don’t go up

Legally if you remove them of the balance sheet the debt is written off. if the parent company lays claim to those debts then that would be false accounting. It would falsely inflate the value of MFC. So, yes, it’s written off. the only way he can ever make the club saleable to give him back...

Maybe, but I’m really not so sure, he winced/flinched again at a body shot not long after that

Yes we started the season with Coulson at LB because we didn’t have one and Roger’s at cf because we didn’t have one. At the moment we really need to get Ayling And a lw signed so that we can put a proper xi on the pitch

Maybe, maybe not. There is usually a glass ceiling for what clubs will pay for a player that’s never played top flight

He’s just written of a huge debt and is stil putting 1m a month in. Nothings changed. There is no evidence that he has stopped or is intending to. The ‘recent direction’ is to try and build our ffp up and stop wasting money on big contracts and fees for players with no resale. We have gone...

Untrue. A) it was confirmed the other day that the initial was more than 10m We paid less than 1.5m for him but for simplicity let’s call it 1.5m and 10m 20% is on profit not total sale. Profit is 8.5m and 20% of that is 1.7m. So if we sold him for 10m, we received 8.3m when we sold him...

Luckily I bought a 12 month contract a week ago, works out £11/month. Might have to evaluate alternatives in 12 months though

6 or 7/10 workaholic type of player. Probable yes, lacks a bit of on the ball quality to be a game changer, but he's a good attack break up player.

Yes, I've got the hiking boots, thumbs up from me

Flip side of that is we know that add ons based on the individual are subject to the buying club changing manager or strategy or the manager falling out with the player.

Pretty similar level to Johnny I would say. Steady and solid. We then need someone to compete with Hackney